1. Notification emails are working properly again. Please check your email spam folder and if you see any emails from the Cantina there, make sure to mark them as "Not Spam". This will help a lot to whitelist the emails and to stop them going to spam.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. IMPORTANT! To be able to create new threads and rate posts, you need to have at least 30 posts in The Cantina.
    Dismiss Notice
  3. Before posting a new thread, check the list with similar threads that will appear when you start typing the thread's title.
    Dismiss Notice

A common misconception about Darth Bane and the Sith going "extinct"

Discussion in 'Prequel Trilogy' started by Darth Sidious, Sep 29, 2018.

  1. Darth Sidious

    Darth Sidious Rebel Official

    Joined:
    May 12, 2015
    Posts:
    822
    Likes Received:
    1,027
    Trophy Points:
    5,892
    Credits:
    1,563
    Ratings:
    +1,652 / 32 / -10
    What we know:

    - from Ki-Ad Mundi that the Sith went "extinct" 1000 years before the movies

    - At some point, all the Sith killed each off except for Darth Bane, who then created the Rule of Two (from statements from Lucas and from TCW)

    What's never stated in the movies or in TCW is when Darth Bane lived. The Legends EU went with the idea that all the Sith but Bane killing each other off and the "extinction" referenced by Ki-Ad Mundi were the same event. However, for all we know from the movies and TCW, Darth Bane created the Rule of Two 8000 years before the movies, and the "extinction" that Ki-Adi referenced happened thousands of years later.
     
    • Like Like x 2
  2. AstromechRecords

    AstromechRecords Jedi General

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2015
    Posts:
    16,637
    Likes Received:
    14,514
    Trophy Points:
    148,277
    Credits:
    18,855
    Ratings:
    +25,634 / 842 / -252
    I mean it’s not like all of the sixth were killed off immediately...it was probably like Order 66 back then that Darth Bane had ordered and it just took a long time
     
  3. RoyleRancor

    RoyleRancor Jedi General

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2016
    Posts:
    4,153
    Likes Received:
    19,172
    Trophy Points:
    147,167
    Credits:
    15,364
    Ratings:
    +25,448 / 116 / -89
    It was only because Darth Seven eight Nine
     
    • Funny Funny x 5
    • Like Like x 1
  4. SegNerd

    SegNerd Rebel Commander

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2015
    Posts:
    323
    Likes Received:
    473
    Trophy Points:
    2,742
    Credits:
    1,140
    Ratings:
    +748 / 23 / -2
    The following information was posted on StarWars.com in 2006:

    It is possible that in Disney Star Wars, the reformation of Darth Bane and the mass extinction of the Sith were separate - but at least in Lucas Star Wars, the reformation was indeed a direct result of the overthrow.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  5. TheSenate

    TheSenate Rebel Trooper

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2018
    Posts:
    120
    Likes Received:
    128
    Trophy Points:
    177
    Credits:
    270
    Ratings:
    +166 / 1 / -2
    I would just take what it says in Legends (I think there's something about it in the Darth Bane novels) and apply it to canon. That's the most likely option.
     
  6. Sir Puke

    Sir Puke Clone

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2018
    Posts:
    45
    Likes Received:
    39
    Trophy Points:
    12
    Credits:
    131
    Ratings:
    +49 / 0 / -0
    I'm kinda hoping that this is what Rian Johnson's new trilogy will be about. At least in that time frame.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  7. Star Dude

    Star Dude Jedi General

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2015
    Posts:
    806
    Likes Received:
    24,537
    Trophy Points:
    149,042
    Credits:
    22,075
    Ratings:
    +25,644 / 2 / -0
    Is there any canon source for this?

    "The Sith killed each other, victims of their own greed. But from the ashes of destruction, I was the last survivor."
    Darth Bane's specter in CW 'Sacrifice' Episode

    http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Darth_Bane
     
    • Like Like x 1
  8. Darth Sidious

    Darth Sidious Rebel Official

    Joined:
    May 12, 2015
    Posts:
    822
    Likes Received:
    1,027
    Trophy Points:
    5,892
    Credits:
    1,563
    Ratings:
    +1,652 / 32 / -10
    My point is that we don't know one way or the other.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  9. Trevor

    Trevor Protector of the Jedi
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2014
    Posts:
    3,258
    Likes Received:
    8,269
    Trophy Points:
    87,277
    Credits:
    17,253
    Ratings:
    +11,922 / 86 / -28
    Yes, it was on the very last televised episode of TCW called "Sacrifice"...and is canon.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Wise Wise x 1
  10. Star Dude

    Star Dude Jedi General

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2015
    Posts:
    806
    Likes Received:
    24,537
    Trophy Points:
    149,042
    Credits:
    22,075
    Ratings:
    +25,644 / 2 / -0
    @Darth Sidiuos, @Trevor: Gentlemen, maybe I did not make myself clear enough.

    I was asking if there’s a canon source regarding this specific statement:

    …for all we know from the movies and TCW, Darth Bane created the Rule of Two 8000 years before the movies, and the "extinction" that Ki-Adi referenced happened thousands of years later.

    Were In the movies and animated shows, it is mentioned that Darth Bane was a Sith Lord that had lived/ruled 8000 years ago?

    Looking at the canon sources I now:

    Ki Adi Mundi:
    ”Impossible, the Sith have been extinct for a millennium.“


    Spectre of Darth Bane:
    ”The Sith killed each other, victims of their own greed. But from the ashes of destruction, I was the last survivor. I chose to pass my knowledge onto only one, I created a legacy so resilient, that now you come before me. Have you come to be my apprentice? You must kill me to gain my place.”

    So either a) the Jedi and the Old Republic were fighting only two Sith, a master and one apprentice, for 7000 years until both were extinct a millennia before the events of TPM, or, and what is more likely for me, b) Darth Banes Legacy started a mere 1000 years ago, not 8000.

    Although I have no access to the Lothal Calendar and the book “Star Wars Rebels: The Visual Guide”, were it is mentioned, allegedly the Sith empire and their war with the Jedi and the old republic were timed around 6000 years ago, which would also contradict option a).

    For whatever it's worth, see: http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Timeline_of_galactic_history

    So what exactly IS the misconception this thread is all about?
     
    • Like Like x 2
  11. Ridcully

    Ridcully Jedi General

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2015
    Posts:
    317
    Likes Received:
    16,692
    Trophy Points:
    144,567
    Credits:
    23,857
    Ratings:
    +17,254 / 3 / -1
    Interesting, if all sith but Darth bane died and he went into hiding, making the Jedi belief they were no more, how does yoda know about the rule of two?
     
    • Wise Wise x 2
    • Like Like x 1
    • Great Post Great Post x 1
  12. Star Dude

    Star Dude Jedi General

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2015
    Posts:
    806
    Likes Received:
    24,537
    Trophy Points:
    149,042
    Credits:
    22,075
    Ratings:
    +25,644 / 2 / -0
    Hmmmm…. That’s a good one @Ridcully!

    Maybe the Jedi Order found some pamphlets of him in one of the deserted Sith temples they invaded?
     
    • Like Like x 1
  13. daRinze

    daRinze Rebel Official

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2015
    Posts:
    886
    Likes Received:
    1,315
    Trophy Points:
    5,592
    Credits:
    1,833
    Ratings:
    +2,242 / 23 / -9
    So does Mace Windu, when they wonder, by the end of TPM, "who was killed, the Master or the Apprentice" : according to Mace's face when Yoda speaks, he seems absolutely neither surprised nor interrogative : I mean, at this moment, Mace perfectly knows what Yoda is speaking about.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Wise Wise x 1
  14. Darth Sidious

    Darth Sidious Rebel Official

    Joined:
    May 12, 2015
    Posts:
    822
    Likes Received:
    1,027
    Trophy Points:
    5,892
    Credits:
    1,563
    Ratings:
    +1,652 / 32 / -10
    Exactly my point. If Darth Bane created the Rule of Two 8000 years ago, Yoda knowing about the Rule of Two would make sense.

    My point was that we don't know when the conflict that Darth Bane was "the last survivor" of happened, so it could have happened 8000 years before the movies. 25,000 years and 3000 years would also work. I think Ki-Adi Mundi was talking about an event that occurred long after Darth Bane's time, because if Mundi was talking about the events that Bane was "the last survivor" of, it wouldn't make sense for Yoda to know about the Rule of Two.

    We don't know how many Jedi-Sith wars there were. Yoda says that Moraband was "abandoned after many wars". Darth Bane was "the last survivor" of a war that occured long before the war that Ki-Adi Mundi was talking about.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  15. Star Dude

    Star Dude Jedi General

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2015
    Posts:
    806
    Likes Received:
    24,537
    Trophy Points:
    149,042
    Credits:
    22,075
    Ratings:
    +25,644 / 2 / -0
    I think they’re not keeping it vague for nothing. The sources I know speak of thousands of years, getting not more precise on that.

    But I guess the Jedi were able to decipher Sith texts. So they wouldn’t have to meet a Sith in person to get the knowledge about the Rule of Two. A mere written/carved info or a discovered Sith droid might be more than enough to attain this knowledge.

    So for me… Bane being last of the line before retreating from ruling openly and the Jedi to believe them extinct for 1000 years still sounds like the most logic variant.

    What does not make so much sense to me is having the rule of two created thousands of years before the Sith had gone into hiding, which means nobody of the Sith would adhere to that rule for this very long timespan during they ruled the galaxy amass.

    Or, the Sith Empire was ruled by just two Sith for thousands of years, which is also a variant that deems very unlikely to me.

    But nobody knows for sure, and hey, I would love to get some more canon information about all of this on the dark ages of the SW galaxy!
     
  16. SegNerd

    SegNerd Rebel Commander

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2015
    Posts:
    323
    Likes Received:
    473
    Trophy Points:
    2,742
    Credits:
    1,140
    Ratings:
    +748 / 23 / -2
    That is a really good question.

    One possibility is that Yoda actually doesn't know about the Rule of Two, and what he meant was, "Always (at least) two there are" - or in other words, "Sith come in pairs." It's possible that Yoda could know that they come in pairs, without knowing about the new limitation of having only one pair.
     
    • Wise Wise x 2
    • Like Like x 1
    • Great Post Great Post x 1
Loading...

Share This Page