1. Notification emails are working properly again. Please check your email spam folder and if you see any emails from the Cantina there, make sure to mark them as "Not Spam". This will help a lot to whitelist the emails and to stop them going to spam.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. IMPORTANT! To be able to create new threads and rate posts, you need to have at least 30 posts in The Cantina.
    Dismiss Notice
  3. Before posting a new thread, check the list with similar threads that will appear when you start typing the thread's title.
    Dismiss Notice

Deadline Claims That Star Wars: The Last Jedi Was 2017s Most Profitable Film

Discussion in 'SWNN News Feed' started by SWNN Probe, Mar 28, 2018.

  1. SWNN Probe

    SWNN Probe Seeker

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2016
    Posts:
    3,318
    Likes Received:
    7,350
    Trophy Points:
    3,842
    Credits:
    8,019
    Ratings:
    +11,664 / 19 / -16
    [​IMG]

    Deadline has run the numbers on Star Wars: The Last Jedi's box office take and has determined that it smoked the competition - and that's all before we get into the film's Blu-Ray, DVD, and Digital sales, meaning that the profit margins still have room to grow. So much for the tinfoil hat conspiracies claiming that the movie was a massive flop for Lucasfilm...





    Life's been good for Lucasfilm so far when it comes to the Star Wars franchise under Disney: Deadline previously reported that 2015's Star Wars: The Force Awakens made a profit of $780M, making it far and away the most profitable film of that year. 2016 brought a similarly good tidings for the company as Rogue One was the third-most profitable film of that year with $319M, eclipsed only by Deadpool and The Secret Life Of Pets (both of which received huge profit margins on budgets a fraction of the size of that year's Star Wars movie). Now, it's looking like 2019 will similarly continue Lucasfilm's winning streak with expenditures closer to the latter movie and profit margins greater than it, as Star Wars: The Last Jedi is 2017's most profitable film with a $417M haul - which, again, comes before we factor in things like home video sales. For frame of comparison, the Top Ten were as follows:
    <ol>
    [*]Star Wars Episode VIII: The Last Jedi - Disney (Lucasfilm), $417M
    [*]Beauty And The Beast - Disney, $414M
    [*]Despicable Me 3 - Universal, $366M
    [*]Jumanji: Welcome To The Jungle - Sony Pictures, $305M
    [*]IT: Chapter One - Warner Bros. (New Line), $293M
    [*]Wonder Woman - Warner Bros. (DC Films), $252M
    [*]Spider-Man: Homecoming - Sony Pictures/Disney (Marvel Studios), $200M
    [*]Thor: Ragnarok - Disney (Marvel Studios), $174M
    [*]Guardians Of The Galaxy Vol. 2 - Disney (Marvel Studios), $154M
    [*]Get Out - Universal, $124M
    </ol>


    Granted, this comes with the caveat that Star Wars: The Last Jedi still made around $700M less than its predecessor, as many detractors of the film will be quick to point out to you (even though percentages are what really matter here - The Last Jedi is the first movie to a sequel that made over $2B, so this is relatively uncharted territory for box office analysis). So why, pray tell, isn't the movie only marginally profitable for the company if Star Wars: The Force Awakens made a $780M profit off of a gross that was $700M greater? The short answer is that it's not an apples-to-apples comparison: each market a film releases in only gets a certain percentage of the profit, which varies based on where the movie is playing. Presumably, this is why it's not necessarily a big deal that The Last Jedi didn't make waves in China with a paltry total just edging past $40M, while The Fate Of The Furious made nearly $400M there for a global total of $1.2B and yet it didn't even crack Deadline's Top Ten - very little of a movie's box office gross made in China actually reaches the production company. Furthermore, The Last Jedi was a considerably less expensive movie for Lucasfilm to make than The Force Awakens, which gave the film more room to actually profit.



    The pressure's still on for Solo: A Star Wars Story to deliver, but as of right now, the Star Wars franchise is looking like one of the safest franchises ever at the modern box office. With $1.516B in Lucasfilm's pockets without counting the mountains of cash made off of licensed content, it's safe to say that Disney is recuperating their $4B investment pretty quickly.





    Click HERE to check out and comment on this topic on our main site
     
    #1 SWNN Probe, Mar 28, 2018
    Last edited: Mar 29, 2018
    • Informative Informative x 4
    • Like Like x 2
    • Cool Cool x 1
  2. Lock_S_Foils

    Lock_S_Foils Red Leader

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2017
    Posts:
    2,293
    Likes Received:
    57,427
    Trophy Points:
    169,907
    Credits:
    40,889
    Ratings:
    +60,697 / 39 / -39
    Very informative article, thanks.

    Maclunkey those pesky facts!
     
    • Like Like x 4
    • Friendly Friendly x 1
  3. Ammianus Marcellinus

    Credits:
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    too positive...........way too positive news. It needs a bit more fake and a lot more negativity to make it work.
     
    • Like Like x 3
  4. quitom

    quitom Rebel Trooper

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2018
    Posts:
    33
    Likes Received:
    118
    Trophy Points:
    147
    Credits:
    323
    Ratings:
    +127 / 1 / -0
    Excellent news. I wonder how Solo will do compared to Rogue One...
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Friendly Friendly x 1
  5. Grand Master Galen Marek

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2015
    Posts:
    21,291
    Likes Received:
    91,612
    Trophy Points:
    176,317
    Credits:
    42,496
    Ratings:
    +105,249 / 338 / -131
    Considering how Han is in the driving seat in this one, should do very well. Only a month's time will tell.
     
    • Like Like x 1
Loading...

Share This Page