1. Due to the increased amount of spam bots on the forum, we are strengthening our defenses. You may experience a CAPTCHA challenge from time to time.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Notification emails are working properly again. Please check your email spam folder and if you see any emails from the Cantina there, make sure to mark them as "Not Spam". This will help a lot to whitelist the emails and to stop them going to spam.
    Dismiss Notice
  3. IMPORTANT! To be able to create new threads and rate posts, you need to have at least 30 posts in The Cantina.
    Dismiss Notice
  4. Before posting a new thread, check the list with similar threads that will appear when you start typing the thread's title.
    Dismiss Notice

Heres an Awesome Chart Comparing the Dawn Spacecraft and a TIE Fighter

Discussion in 'SWNN News Feed' started by SWNN Probe, Oct 23, 2016.

  1. SWNN Probe

    SWNN Probe Seeker

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2016
    Posts:
    9,939
    Likes Received:
    11,485
    Trophy Points:
    3,842
    Credits:
    12,351
    Ratings:
    +18,297 / 24 / -23
    [​IMG]

    From Janey Tracey at Outerplaces.com



    Star Wars is often viewed more as a space fantasy than a relatively true-to-life speculative fiction in the vein of Star Trek (unless you want to accept that midichlorians are canon), but some of its technologies and species are more plausible than others. Tatooine's binary suns, for example, often occur in real life, and scientists recently found what looks like a Sarlacc pit on a prehistoric worm. Now, a new chart from a NASA employee shows us all the similarities (and differences) between the Dawn spacecraft and a TIE fighter, and the latter is more realistic than we would have expected.





    [​IMG] Dawn information courtesy of NASA JPL, TIE fighter information courtesy of Galactic Empire Data Bank



    The chart, presented at Long Beach Comic Con's Space Expo, was made by NASA JPL missions operations engineer Keri Bean, who is currently a science planner for the Dawn mission. It compares various aspects of the Dawn spacecraft and the TIE fighter, everything from its size to its navigation and avionics systems. Obviously, there are several notable differences between the two crafts; TIE fighters are destroyed constantly, so they're necessarily smaller and more disposable. It also means that they are significantly less costly, and that they can only fit one pilot inside, while the unmanned Dawn has 40-plus engineers working on it at any given time.



    Amusingly, there are also several ways in which the Dawn spacecraft is more impressive than a TIE fighter. Most notably, Dawn has been traveling in space without resupplying for nine years now, while TIE fighters need to resupply every couple of days. And while TIE fighters naturally have higher speeds and acceleration rates, Dawn's longevity means it's accumulated a much higher total change in velocity over the years.



    But the most interesting sections of the chart are the similarities between the Dawn spacecraft and the TIE fighter. Dawn is the first spacecraft to use ion thrusters, which create thrust from the acceleration of ions, to enter/exit orbit around an asteroid. This allows them to reach the same speeds of chemical rockets while using much less propellant, which makes them more energy-efficient. Ion propulsion has been a sci-fi trope since the early 1900s, and of course, powers the TIE fighters in Star Wars.



    And even better, Dawn was almost equipped with lasers, just like a TIE fighter. Where the TIE fighters have laser cannons to fight their space battles, Dawn almost had a laser altimeter, a scientific instrument that uses lasers to determine how far the spacecraft is from the surface of the object it's studying. The instrument was proposed but not ultimately brought on board, which is a shame, because we would have loved to think there were a space laser hanging around Ceres.





    This article originally appeared on Outerplaces.com







    Click HERE to check out and comment on this topic on our main site
     
    #1 SWNN Probe, Oct 23, 2016
    Last edited: Oct 23, 2016
  2. Amanaman

    Amanaman Rebel Official

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2015
    Posts:
    1,337
    Likes Received:
    2,387
    Trophy Points:
    9,917
    Credits:
    5,686
    Ratings:
    +3,760 / 238 / -86
    I have to say that I think it's a little funny that some fans consider Star Trek to be more sci fi than Star Wars. Being a Trek fan as well, I have to admit that there are many elements there that go way beyond something as simple as midichlorians (which I dislike). Why get bothered with some aspects of SW that seem like fantasy when we have all powerful cosmic beings like Q who can alter reality as he pleases? The replicater and holodeck tech is greatly questionable as well and don't even get me started with the darn universal translator that's supposed to be in the com badge which mysteriously keeps on working even if said badge is removed from the crew member, destroyed or left behind.
     
Loading...

Share This Page