1. Due to the increased amount of spam bots on the forum, we are strengthening our defenses. You may experience a CAPTCHA challenge from time to time.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Notification emails are working properly again. Please check your email spam folder and if you see any emails from the Cantina there, make sure to mark them as "Not Spam". This will help a lot to whitelist the emails and to stop them going to spam.
    Dismiss Notice
  3. IMPORTANT! To be able to create new threads and rate posts, you need to have at least 30 posts in The Cantina.
    Dismiss Notice
  4. Before posting a new thread, check the list with similar threads that will appear when you start typing the thread's title.
    Dismiss Notice

Incredible show with one problem

Discussion in 'Star Wars: The Bad Batch' started by Jaxxon, Aug 10, 2021.

  1. Jaxxon

    Jaxxon Green Space Rabbit

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2017
    Posts:
    1,073
    Likes Received:
    14,149
    Trophy Points:
    145,117
    Credits:
    11,364
    Ratings:
    +15,850 / 29 / -4
    I love Bad Batch. It's maybe the most cinematic thing Lucasfilm Animation has ever done. The lighting, the music, the action sequences, the character-based storytelling. It's just superb.

    But I have one gripe, and maybe some of you have more insight into this than me:

    The texture animation.

    Obviously, a TV show will never have the animation quality of a theatrical release. That's not what I'm asking for.

    When I look at other 3D-animated streaming shows, like some of the stuff my daughter watches, I see texture simulations for things like hair, skin, grass. And in today's world, those sorts of texture/physics simulations are pretty standard and sometimes even open-source at high quality.

    But in Bad Batch, despite the high quality of everything else, those textures--skin, hair, grass, metal--feel almost as chunky and clay-like as they did in 2008.

    so what I'm wondering is: why? Is there a reason for this? Is there a cost I'm not thinking of? And does it bug anyone else?
     
    • Like Like x 2
  2. Ghost of Obi Wan Kenobi

    Ghost of Obi Wan Kenobi Rebel Official

    Joined:
    May 5, 2016
    Posts:
    692
    Likes Received:
    1,141
    Trophy Points:
    7,392
    Credits:
    2,292
    Ratings:
    +1,574 / 25 / -6
    I think it is a stylistic choice. George Lucas’ original Clone Wars was intentionally claylike and stiff, because he was emulating Gerry Anderson’s Thunderbirds. This show, while it could have gone photoreal decided did not to keep this consistent look.
    Now, the question is, SHOULD they have gone for a more realistic look?
    I think so.
    I personally do not like the “plastic-y” look CGI offers. I much prefer realistic style computer graphics that shows moving strands of hair and skin texture, like KOTOR or the 2007 Beowulf movie. But since this was a “kids” show, perhaps they wanted to give young audiences something more “friendly” to watch.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  3. AkJackster

    AkJackster Rebel Trooper

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2022
    Posts:
    23
    Likes Received:
    116
    Trophy Points:
    147
    Credits:
    164
    Ratings:
    +128 / 0 / -0
    same with what kenobi said, its technically clone wars with main characters
     
Loading...

Share This Page