1. Due to the increased amount of spam bots on the forum, we are strengthening our defenses. You may experience a CAPTCHA challenge from time to time.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Notification emails are working properly again. Please check your email spam folder and if you see any emails from the Cantina there, make sure to mark them as "Not Spam". This will help a lot to whitelist the emails and to stop them going to spam.
    Dismiss Notice
  3. IMPORTANT! To be able to create new threads and rate posts, you need to have at least 30 posts in The Cantina.
    Dismiss Notice
  4. Before posting a new thread, check the list with similar threads that will appear when you start typing the thread's title.
    Dismiss Notice

Mark Hamill dropping hints

Discussion in 'General Sequel Trilogy Discussion' started by YubNubBub, May 27, 2017.

  1. YubNubBub

    YubNubBub Rebel General

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2015
    Posts:
    371
    Likes Received:
    697
    Trophy Points:
    3,967
    Credits:
    2,372
    Ratings:
    +1,141 / 192 / -358
    I have come to the conclusion, after hours worth of research, Mark Hamill is dropping subtle hints about Luke Skywalker as a whole, for the sequel trilogy.

    I will cite a video as evidence (please note this video is not to "trash" the new Star Wars trilogy but rather as reference and some of you may have seen it already):



    Ok, the point is not Luke trashing the franchise. Because Luke doesn't do that, he is contractually unable to do anything like shine a negative light, but he is free to express concern and opinion. In other words, contractually, Mark walks a fine line.

    Onto the actual hints....

    One thing Luke hinted at was gaps. He experienced personal gaps during the Force Awakens, story gaps, and he approached JJ and JJ "sent him away with a cookie and a pat on the head".

    But what gaps? What questions? What backstory is he alluding to.

    I believe I have surmised the answer.

    We all know Luke, as an action Jedi. Against the wishes of Yoda and Obi Wan he rushed off to face his father (spoiler alert!). He rushed to defend the rebel alliance as a novice force user unable to do pretty much anything but make a lucky shot with the force, while his father was about 3 seconds from pulvirizing him after killing countless other rebel pilots.

    So we know Luke is a man of action. We know Luke can reach out into the force when his friends are in trouble.

    So one scene, Mark approached JJ over, was I believe, the death of Han Solo. (Mark even stated it would have been better for him and Carrie to be present, more emotional). Luke having sensed his friends in danger before, and growing more powerful since ESB, why wouldn't he have sensed Han about to die, and once again in Luke ESB fashion, come to save the day? Or even Leia? Leia easily sensed when Han passed, why not the premonition of the future?

    Should not this be how the story should have progressed? With Luke Skywalker showing up to face his former apprentice? Or did he just sense the danger and choose to simply ignore it?

    Mark has a valid point.

    But there are many others, he is alluding to. Consitently.

    Mark is relying on you, us, to reach out with our feelings to sense if things are indeed progressing as they should.

    Would it not have been a more climatic moment for Luke to catch the lightsaber from Kylo? To drive him away? To confront his old padawan?

    Was that not the jedi way as set before us?

    Mark is dropping the breadcrumbs, from multiple interviews, multiple sources. He is relying on his fans, to put the blast shield down, and REACH OUT.

    So, I agree with Luke Skywalker. Because its not Mark who is speaking this, it is LUKE SKYWALKER coming from Marks mind who played him. It is the boy of Darth Vader, the slow learning, brash, but talented individual. The one who was all about saving his friends.

    I sincerely hope that I am wrong. Wrong in the sense they are fabricating an entirely new "Luke" that conflicts with his character.
     
    #1 YubNubBub, May 27, 2017
    Last edited: May 31, 2017
    • Like Like x 2
    • Clouded Clouded x 2
    • Great Post Great Post x 1
  2. General_Tarkin

    General_Tarkin Rebel General

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2016
    Posts:
    736
    Likes Received:
    1,250
    Trophy Points:
    4,842
    Credits:
    1,978
    Ratings:
    +1,880 / 74 / -32
    Not really... What exactly are you trying to say?
    Luke didn't show up in TFA because it's not how the script was built up. It could've been possible with a different script, but they concentrated on Han and the new characters in this version. Luke showing up from nowhere on SK base would've been super awkward fanfiction-ish deus ex writing. Maybe if some sort of final confrontation would've taken place on Ach-to it might've worked, but definitely not on SK base imo.
     
    • Like Like x 5
  3. YubNubBub

    YubNubBub Rebel General

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2015
    Posts:
    371
    Likes Received:
    697
    Trophy Points:
    3,967
    Credits:
    2,372
    Ratings:
    +1,141 / 192 / -358
    You did not properly read my post.

    The script could have been altered.

    From the pov of Luke Skywalker from Canon, he would have sensed Han in danger (like in ESB), and in prequel and original trilogy fashion, such as Obi Wan confronting his padwan DV, or Luke confronting his Father, Luke would have done the same thing, confronting Kylo.
     
    • Like Like x 2
  4. General_Tarkin

    General_Tarkin Rebel General

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2016
    Posts:
    736
    Likes Received:
    1,250
    Trophy Points:
    4,842
    Credits:
    1,978
    Ratings:
    +1,880 / 74 / -32
    Like I said, it is not how the script was built up...

    Imagine the situation. Han dies, Finn and Rey confront Kylo. Kylo defeats Finn and then Rey (they both have to fight otherwise their role in the movie is rendered pointless). Kylo almost kills Rey then Luke shows up from nowhere... He obviously defeats Kylo, but Kylo escapes. Ok, but then what? Since Luke suddenly appeared the tone and pacing of the movie is immidiately altered. You suddenly want answers from Luke and can't properly mourne Han's death. How does the movie end? Where does Luke go after Sk base blows up and why? Where do Finn and Rey go? Where is Chevie and the Falcon? What about Leia and her connection with Luke? What about the incomplete map arc, it's pointless now etc...
    I'm not a writer, but it's pretty obvious that this version of the script couldn't have ended with Luke on SK base.
     
    • Like Like x 3
    • Hopeful Hopeful x 1
  5. YubNubBub

    YubNubBub Rebel General

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2015
    Posts:
    371
    Likes Received:
    697
    Trophy Points:
    3,967
    Credits:
    2,372
    Ratings:
    +1,141 / 192 / -358
    Im just following what Mark Hamill said. Im not going into what if's here.

    But its SW tradition for master to confront apprentice. Obi Wan and DV. Yoda and Darth Tyrannus (Dooku).

    Simple matter remains, Hamill, who played Luke, told JJ what would have happened if Han was in danger. Luke, like in ESB, would have sensed it and went to his aid, like before.

    What Hamill spoke, was from the viewpoint of Luke Skywalker, because he played him and knows his character.

    As for the what if's, any skilled writer could have accomplished that task. JJ ignored it. Luke could have somehow made it, without the what if shield generator was here or falcon there, it could have been written in.

    As I said, thats the POV of Luke Skywalker from Canon, that he would have sensed it and went to the rescue of his friend. There is really no arguement you can make against that, because it is supported by Canon from Episodes 1-6.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  6. General_Tarkin

    General_Tarkin Rebel General

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2016
    Posts:
    736
    Likes Received:
    1,250
    Trophy Points:
    4,842
    Credits:
    1,978
    Ratings:
    +1,880 / 74 / -32
    But you need to go into "what ifs" if you suggest a plot change like this.
    He still can in the next episodes. Luke and Kylo's relation wasn't fleshed out enough in TFA for them to have a meaningful fight. Old Luke wasn't fleshed out at all. This isn't how you build up a story.
    Yes, with a completely different script. I'm not necessarily disagreeing with your idea, but for an ending like that they would've needed to create an entirely different story. Note how Michael Arndt dropped the idea of Luke appearing in the middle of the movie, since he immidiately changed the tone and focus.
    I have to disagree, since this Luke could be a completely different character. 30 years have passed and many things happened.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Great Post Great Post x 1
  7. YubNubBub

    YubNubBub Rebel General

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2015
    Posts:
    371
    Likes Received:
    697
    Trophy Points:
    3,967
    Credits:
    2,372
    Ratings:
    +1,141 / 192 / -358
    Well your disagreeing with Mark Hamill then who plays Luke Skywalker. And you could be right, I will elaborate later on that.

    He made it clear Luke should have been there at Han and Kylo's meeting.

    I still take his view, that he would have sensed it and went to the aid of his friend, based on the evidence. I also take the position it would have been fitting in tradition as Master confronting Apprentice.

    We each have our views and will have to agree to disagree. But for me, I am going with evidence from Canon, the character of Luke, Mark Hamills comment of how when he approached JJ he "sent him away with a cookie and pat on the head". I am going with all that. I believe, regardless of any major script changes, which I do infact comprehend. The disregarding of the map, etc etc.

    My point is Mark knows Luke, and Luke knows the force, and Luke tells us he would have sensed it and came to his aid. Major script and plot points would have to be changed, agreed.

    But from Mark, who could be wrong depending we don't know what's going on with Luke, and maybe he doesn't even know, simply says Luke is strong, able to "read the wind" of danger through the force, and in reckless yoda deriding fashion rushes to rescue his friends.

    So, we will have to wait and see. If Luke doesn't have a good reason in TLJ to stand by idle, or maybe be stranded on Ach-too, then he doesn't have a good reason to have not came to Han's aid and confront his former apprentice.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  8. General_Tarkin

    General_Tarkin Rebel General

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2016
    Posts:
    736
    Likes Received:
    1,250
    Trophy Points:
    4,842
    Credits:
    1,978
    Ratings:
    +1,880 / 74 / -32
    *You're.
    And I'm not disagreeing with anyone. I'm merely talking from the storyteller's perspective.
    Btw Mark also supported the idea of Luke turning to the dark side in the end of ep VI (which Lucas rejected). How does that comply with your story?
    Original trilogy Luke very certainly. Not to mention the destruction of the Hosnian system (where millions, if not billions died).
    And yeah, him leaving everything back and just disappearing is not easy to accept, but maybe there's a good reason for it.
    Yoda also went into exile after his first confrontation with Palatine (which he didn't even lose that much, in fact he held up very well against him, and Pappatine was rather lucky).
    But this Luke isn't necessarily original trilogy Luke.
    "Evidence", lol. This is not a crime scene. We're talking about evolving a story, and the progression of multiple characters in a completly different situation. If you can easely deduct what's exactly going to happen in the next chapters, then there isn't really a reason to tell the story.
    Like I said, since Luke and Kylo's relation wasn't fleshed out at all in TFA, their fight would've been completly meaningless. You don't write major plotpoints into a script just for the sake of a "tradition" (which isn't really a tradition btw).
    Not just major script points, but all of it. Like I said, if Luke appears on SK base, the movie can't be finished and everything TFA has built up is null and void.

    This wasn't an easy story to write. The main cause of the problems is the new characters. Once an old one appears, you suddently don't care about the new ones at all. The tone and pacing is immidiately changed. Especially a character like Luke who needs to answer dozens of questions. Han's role as a mentor that joins them in the confrontation was perfectly incorporated. So was Leia's as a leader from the back. But Luke? Such a big character is very problematic. This movie would've had 6 (!) main characters and 3 of them iconic legends with 30 years of untold backstory.
    Writing this story wasn't an easy job at all. Even Michael Arndt, (one of the best in the industry) struggled with it and after 8 months of work only fragments were created. If it was only Han, Luke and Leia (the old EU was told mostly by their perspective) it would've been much easier, but obviously the story needs a new generation to be able to continue.
     
    #8 General_Tarkin, May 27, 2017
    Last edited: May 27, 2017
    • Like Like x 6
    • Great Post Great Post x 1
  9. YubNubBub

    YubNubBub Rebel General

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2015
    Posts:
    371
    Likes Received:
    697
    Trophy Points:
    3,967
    Credits:
    2,372
    Ratings:
    +1,141 / 192 / -358
    I don't disagree with your points. They are valid.

    For the record I do know the difference between your and you're but typically chose to ignore it for speed sake.

    Anyway, my major point was Mark tells us Luke would have sensed it and came to his aid. A very valid point based on what we have to go by, which is indeed evidence from storytelling, from Episodes 1-6.

    But you are absolutely right. There is so much we absolutely do not know. We don't know why Luke is in exile. We also do not know if the dark side was clouding his vision of the event.

    I simply agree with Mark when he eluxes Luke as a character would have rushed towards his aid. Whether there are things behind the scenes, we will have to wait and see.

    So, simply put, Mark has valid points. Such valid points, that a rewrite could possibly have been needed, altering the entire course of the Sequel saga.

    If the writers fail to take into account the characters way of doing things, then we aren't really being delivered Star Wars. They are fabricating a completely different Luke that conflicts with everything written before. Something to keep in mind.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  10. atreides602

    atreides602 Rebelscum

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2017
    Posts:
    175
    Likes Received:
    290
    Trophy Points:
    1,642
    Credits:
    1,006
    Ratings:
    +477 / 10 / -9
    Luke felt on Dagobah that Han and Leya were in danger and he runs to them for help, but Vader could've kill them all five times if he wanted to by the time Luke arives on Bespin , that was the story ;
    Now he ( probably ) felt the destruction of the Republic's core planets , and he choose not to go 'guns blasing' against the starkiller base and first order, thats the story; he feels Han is in danger , maybe he also sees that he can't do nothing about it , or even considered what he was doing on the island is more important, like other posters said, people change and evolve .
    In the end is the same discussion since tfa, people complain is a rehash , people complain the heroes are doing things a diferent way like they did in the ot , at least have the decency to wait until december to pass judges and post crap like MH is shiting all over SW, after all Mark is paid to act and Rian to direct.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  11. General_Tarkin

    General_Tarkin Rebel General

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2016
    Posts:
    736
    Likes Received:
    1,250
    Trophy Points:
    4,842
    Credits:
    1,978
    Ratings:
    +1,880 / 74 / -32
    Neither do I with your points, to be honest. It makes little sense for Luke not to do anything about the terrible things that happened in TFA. The explanation has to be very well written in order to me to accept it. Like the island dosen't let him leave or something similar (although that would be a bit forced).

    I have to admit that I really liked the idea of having Luke as the McGuffin of ep VII. The race to find the missing jedi master could have been a very good movie.
    When TFA is about this (the first half), it's actually good, but as soon as Starkiller base pops up and the focus swifts to rehasing the ending of ep IV, the story immidiately takes a sharp nosedive.
    They could have explored the history of the Republic and the jedi order in the 30 years (at least partially, but certainly better than just Rey having an ambiguous vision) between VI and VII in a creative way, while delivering a fun adventure/drama movie. Like Rey finding relics while searching for Luke, exploring new and old planets/places, discovering more about the enemy, the force, and herself (pretty much what the concept art suggested). The entire thing could have culminated in an epic battle near Luke's hideout or near the last piece of the map or something similar.

    So, while I overall still like TFA, I have to admit (especially after Rogue One) that it's not really well written. Arndt struggled to deliver the story in time and the JJ&Kasdan duo failed to do so as well. There are way too many things left unexplained and the fact that Rian recently tweeted that basically nothing (!) way layed out after TFA, suggests serious problems about ep VII's script. JJ really wanted to make the movie, and noone is denying his excitement and love towards SW, but he should've waited for a worthy story before starting the production. Kasdan himself once said that movies like Star Wars and Jaws don't just grow on trees. Writing a story for it is very hard. I think Disney should have let Arndt having that 18 extra months he needed for ep VII.

    Although I still have high hopes towards the ST. For example the lightsaber-theory about Rey's parentage (which is unlikely to become the real deal though) pretty much proved me that there are ways to improve TFA. Rogue One was also good imo, much better than TFA. It managed to capture the essence of Star Wars while expanding its story and lore in a creative way, while also delivering a good standalone movie about hope and sacrifice. This is what the ST needs as well. They can't just let Star Wars become the next mediocre blockbuster- factory, like Marvel. What made Star Wars special was the story and characters, not just the visuals. And even though I dislike the prequel trilogy, I still believe that it's way more creative than most recent blockbusters.

    So far I like what we've seen from ep VIII though. The Vanity Fair photos indicate something unique and special. Lets hope for the best.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  12. Josh29

    Josh29 Rebel Trooper

    Joined:
    May 19, 2017
    Posts:
    29
    Likes Received:
    23
    Trophy Points:
    127
    Credits:
    378
    Ratings:
    +36 / 2 / -0
    Luke Skywalker Theory: Why Hamill "Fundamentally Disagreed" with the Direction of Luke in Star Wars Episode 8

    – Hamill has previously said that he wished Luke had come in at the end of The Force Awakens to save the day

    – So, Hamill views Luke as a brave hero

    – If he "fundamentally disagreed" with the direction of Luke in The Last Jedi, then that means Luke likely will not fully fit this characterization in Episode 8

    – Instead, the most likely scenario is that Luke will be a reluctant hero in The Last Jedi

    – This fits with my previous theory that Luke will be in a bad place psychology to start out The Last Jedi and that he will initially resist or reject Rey’s pleas for him to join the fight against the First Order

    – Link to the Full Article: http://starwarsanalysis.com/luke-skywalker-theory-vanity-fair/
     
    • Like Like x 1
  13. Bluemilk

    Bluemilk I AM the Senate

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2014
    Posts:
    4,552
    Likes Received:
    8,974
    Trophy Points:
    92,402
    Credits:
    12,243
    Ratings:
    +14,898 / 149 / -71
    These sequels aren't about Luke, per se, so having him do all these things in the OP would have been just taken away from the new cast as Michael Arndt supposedly did in his draft

    The other thing is this; if Luke saved the day in every scene and come in all the time doing exactly like in the OT, then wouldn't people have griped about it being like the OT? People would say, oh they're ripping off the OT in which people already complain about.

    Mark may have a point of how Luke should go, as he himself stated on Twitter he's been known to be wrong. Even in GL's version Luke would've been a cameo/Obi Wan type character.

    This arc type is the opposite. Instead of Mentor coming to hero as Obi Wan did. The Hero comes to the Mentor
     
    • Like Like x 1
  14. General_Tarkin

    General_Tarkin Rebel General

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2016
    Posts:
    736
    Likes Received:
    1,250
    Trophy Points:
    4,842
    Credits:
    1,978
    Ratings:
    +1,880 / 74 / -32
    This is part of the issue imo. The old EU mostly told the story from the old trio's perspective and it was better than what we got so far. I think after TFA, it's pretty evident that as much as they're trying to push a new generation of heroes, they can't just ignore the old ones. It's just not how things work. Those characters are too iconic. Although like I said it earlier, Han was very well incorporated into TFA (although his first appearance in the Falcon was too deus-ex to me).
    This whole "being like the OT" argument started after TFA pretty much rehashed the entire story of ANH. I really doubt that a completely new story where Luke saves that day would've triggered the same reaction.
     
    #14 General_Tarkin, May 29, 2017
    Last edited: May 29, 2017
    • Like Like x 1
    • Clouded Clouded x 1
  15. tm0910196

    tm0910196 Guest

    Credits:
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    This makes me think...Maybe it would have been best to have two sequel trilogies (with the first made around the time the PT was made), so that we could have one more trilogy with the old trio as the focus, and then, by the sequel-sequel trilogy (i.e., now), we'd be ready to move the focus onto the new generation.
     
  16. Bluemilk

    Bluemilk I AM the Senate

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2014
    Posts:
    4,552
    Likes Received:
    8,974
    Trophy Points:
    92,402
    Credits:
    12,243
    Ratings:
    +14,898 / 149 / -71
    Kind of like an easing into phase? One thing I do dislike is the gap between trilogies. ROTJ and the ST
     
    • Like Like x 1
  17. tm0910196

    tm0910196 Guest

    Credits:
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    Exactly, yeah. That way, we wouldn't be itching to know what happened to Luke/Leia/Han, and we wouldn't mind if they weren't the focus anymore.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  18. AlDavis

    AlDavis Rebel General

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2017
    Posts:
    56
    Likes Received:
    1,679
    Trophy Points:
    4,757
    Credits:
    2,472
    Ratings:
    +1,710 / 2 / -0
    HAHAHAHAHA Ending with the weird Yoda. Love a poetic license.
    --- Double Post Merged, May 29, 2017, Original Post Date: May 29, 2017 ---
    Of the main actors of any Star Wars Saga film, Mark Hamill and Carrie Fisher seemed the most tied to their characters. They were Luke and Leia as much as they were Mark And Carrie. Just like the roller coaster of being a human (i.e "I like myself/I hate myself", "Im strong/Im weak" cycle) Mark and Carrie felt the ups and downs of being this other person. Loving the Role/Hating the Role. We criticize ourselves, and they SHOULD get to criticize their role. Especially when as accepting Star Wars participants, they actually truly love their role, even when they hate it.

    Mark carries a larger weight. Only he can hear the force of Carrie. As they shared the same bond to the legacy of their characters.
     
  19. General_Tarkin

    General_Tarkin Rebel General

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2016
    Posts:
    736
    Likes Received:
    1,250
    Trophy Points:
    4,842
    Credits:
    1,978
    Ratings:
    +1,880 / 74 / -32
    That might've been better. This entire ST should have been made around 10 years ago, when the old trio was healthier and more physically active. Marginalising them wasn't a good idea. While I liked the new characters from TFA, the best part to me was still Han. These characters are so iconic and have such a rich story and progression...

    Although their idea of centering each new episode with one of the old trio is a not a bad idea either. We'll see how it will work out.
    I have faith in Rian Johnson and TLJ. He worked very hard in the last 3 years, and ep VIII's developement went very well (from what we know at least). Almost a year and a half in post production only is a rarity with recent blockbusters.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Informative Informative x 1
  20. Xeven

    Xeven Rebel Official

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2015
    Posts:
    1,265
    Likes Received:
    1,307
    Trophy Points:
    7,967
    Credits:
    3,318
    Ratings:
    +2,528 / 253 / -116
    Luke maybe wants to be stranded there and had no means to leave. Even if he sens d Hans danger, he maybe stranded on purpose.
     
    • Like Like x 1
Loading...

Share This Page