1. Due to the increased amount of spam bots on the forum, we are strengthening our defenses. You may experience a CAPTCHA challenge from time to time.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Notification emails are working properly again. Please check your email spam folder and if you see any emails from the Cantina there, make sure to mark them as "Not Spam". This will help a lot to whitelist the emails and to stop them going to spam.
    Dismiss Notice
  3. IMPORTANT! To be able to create new threads and rate posts, you need to have at least 30 posts in The Cantina.
    Dismiss Notice
  4. Before posting a new thread, check the list with similar threads that will appear when you start typing the thread's title.
    Dismiss Notice

Star Wars On Film

Discussion in 'General Sequel Trilogy Discussion' started by AstromechRecords, Jan 29, 2016.

  1. AstromechRecords

    AstromechRecords Jedi General

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2015
    Posts:
    16,794
    Likes Received:
    15,181
    Trophy Points:
    149,777
    Credits:
    20,228
    Ratings:
    +26,536 / 845 / -253
    • Informative Informative x 1
  2. TheNinthCousin

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2015
    Posts:
    68
    Likes Received:
    43
    Trophy Points:
    22
    Credits:
    668
    Ratings:
    +91 / 16 / -16
    I WANT A STAR WARS FILM SHOT WITH 3D CAMERAS
     
    #2 TheNinthCousin, Jan 29, 2016
    Last edited by a moderator: Jan 29, 2016
    • Funny Funny x 1
  3. Ammianus Marcellinus

    Credits:
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    I'd rather have it on film. You see it immediately. Making a Star Wars film in dialogue with the originals means you will have to have the suitable materials and techniques to do so. Film needs a bit of grain and haze. Digital is too clean, strips the movie of it's magic. So does something like HFR like they did with the Hobbit. I'm a purist.
     
    #3 Ammianus Marcellinus, Jan 29, 2016
    Last edited by a moderator: Jan 29, 2016
    • Wise Wise x 1
    • Clouded Clouded x 1
  4. AstromechRecords

    AstromechRecords Jedi General

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2015
    Posts:
    16,794
    Likes Received:
    15,181
    Trophy Points:
    149,777
    Credits:
    20,228
    Ratings:
    +26,536 / 845 / -253
    You can actual add a grain filter...there's a literal button that makes it turn into a 35mm look .
     
    • Informative Informative x 1
    • Funny Funny x 1
  5. Ammianus Marcellinus

    Credits:
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    lol....yeah. What world we live in. I understand why George wanted digital: "because the effects guys could fill this in later".

    By the way, if you would sum them up for me concretely, what are the advantages of digital?
     
    • Friendly Friendly x 1
  6. AstromechRecords

    AstromechRecords Jedi General

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2015
    Posts:
    16,794
    Likes Received:
    15,181
    Trophy Points:
    149,777
    Credits:
    20,228
    Ratings:
    +26,536 / 845 / -253
    It's cheaper, higher resolution, saves money, load times are quicker, easier to shoot on, and makes shooting s movie a lot faster..."filling effects later" has nothing t do with Digital, either. For example, TPM was all film. GL had to load all the film into his droid edit machine and then run it through a computer so the CGI could be done before re-printing back into film...if there was digital back then that was satisfactory enough for SW, it would have readily saved sooo much money .
     
  7. HylianBowcaster

    HylianBowcaster Rebelscum

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2015
    Posts:
    95
    Likes Received:
    132
    Trophy Points:
    842
    Credits:
    855
    Ratings:
    +203 / 2 / -1
    Count me in for digital. Everything is digitally processed now anyway, there's really no point to shooting on film unless you're shooting on 70mm or IMAX. The only people who really benefit from shooting on film are the film crew. As soon as the movie has finished shooting, the film is scanned digitally and distributed digitally. In most cases no one will ever see the truly film version of their movie.

    If anyone is really interested in film vs digital, watch the documentary Side by Side. It's pretty informational.
     
    #7 HylianBowcaster, Feb 3, 2016
    Last edited: Feb 9, 2016
  8. Rebo

    Rebo Nearsighted Whill Guardian
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2014
    Posts:
    2,500
    Likes Received:
    4,603
    Trophy Points:
    14,747
    Credits:
    6,145
    Ratings:
    +7,330 / 99 / -40
    Film by a landslide. Digital is fine for its own purposes. But Star Wars needs to have the tangible feel of real celluloid. No, digital filters and effects to recreate it aren't the same thing.

    Just like a keyboard can make a convincing violin, but it still pales in comparisons to sitting in a concert hall listening to the real thing. There is an intangible quality to the analog world that does make difference

    You can have your digital on the anthology films. But the saga proper should stay on film.
     
    • Wise Wise x 1
  9. HylianBowcaster

    HylianBowcaster Rebelscum

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2015
    Posts:
    95
    Likes Received:
    132
    Trophy Points:
    842
    Credits:
    855
    Ratings:
    +203 / 2 / -1
    Since we're talking about film and digital and Star Wars, some of you might be interested in this:
    https://storify.com/tvaziri/steve-yedlin
    Rian Johnson's frequent collaborator Steve Yedlin, has been developing a way for digital to replicate film. Basically the goal is to demonstrate that the final image is not entirely dependent on the capture media.
     
    • Informative Informative x 1
  10. AstromechRecords

    AstromechRecords Jedi General

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2015
    Posts:
    16,794
    Likes Received:
    15,181
    Trophy Points:
    149,777
    Credits:
    20,228
    Ratings:
    +26,536 / 845 / -253
    Well digital CAN replicate film quality to a degree already with a button on some editing suites that turn it into a "look" of film .
     
Loading...

Share This Page