THREAD FOR THOSE WHO HATED THE MOVIE

Authority figures shall not be questioned when those authority figures are Admiral Tumblr Hair and Rose Tico. Poe and Finn found out the hard way.

 

I specifically said that because I don't like Internet bullies and bullies in a largest scale.

 

I wonder, it was the Russians creating bots before to vote down, what country is creating bots to vote it up?

 

So now its a problem that people are giving positive fake reviews? Give me a break. Only if it breaks the narrative, right?

 

Take your break, every post isn't for you. Give some rigged bad reviews and I might change my mind.

It is really really weird to make fake good reviews for a masterpiece.

 

There are tons of details about why the movie failed. Some people just feel hurt and wanna vent with like-minded people. Nothing wrong with that. Especially in a dedicated thread.

 

It is really really weird to make fake reviews for anything. At least now you see that RT scores are rigged.

 

Find me some ...

At least, we found 200 at least fake good reviews, it's right there.

And I'm pretty sure it will be the same today.

"10 stars, incredible movie" ... LMAO.

"I love Rose and Finn arc, it was awesome." ... ROFL.

And yes, it is rigged, it should be much lower like 30% ...

 

Double standard much? Yeah sure don't complain about the system if it favors your viewpoint, but suddenly it's "oh my gawd! It can't be! It can't be real!"

 

But what is your reasoning here? If we disconnect from emotion and take a purely rational look at the information, it seems like your conclusion is somewhat backwards. What I mean is, if I look at "The Last Jedi" I get these poll results:

Google Users: 74%
IMDB: 7.3/10
Cinemascore: A
ComScore/ScreenEngine: 89%
PostTrak: 5/5

This is, of course, not taking into account aggregated critic responses which run the 85%-95% range. Though I would ask, what is your take on the fact that the critical response matches the audience exit data?

In contrast RT Users: 46%
Metacritic Users: 4.5/10

If I look at the data I see two online polls with audiences giving 74%/73%, two online polls giving 46%/45%, and actual exit polls (which cannot be manipulated like online polls can possibly be manipulated- not that I am saying they are, but that the potential does exist, whereas it doesn't exist in the real world) giving 4-5/5 (90%-100%).

So the two aggregates 46%/45% are decidedly the anomaly in this statistic field. But you seem to be regarding the anomalous as being that which is, the norm. My question is, how do you rationalize the two anomalies as being the norm? Even to the point of suggesting the anomalies themselves don't reflect the norm, but should be lower. It's like if we have seven sources saying X, and two sources saying Y - why would you conclude Y to be accurate, when it is the anomaly?

 

Buddy, this had been 6 months that we are called liars, idiots, delusional, taunted by some of our "fellow" fans right here, so it's just funny for some of us to find that the fake reviews are not what it seems to be.

Nothing against you but just take a look at what we got on this start of this topic with a thought police telling us that if we didn't think that movie was a masterpiece, it's because we are just bad people.

Even if I absolutely do agree with you, the only opinion that matters is mine.

--- Double Post Merged, Jun 13, 2018, Original Post Date: Jun 13, 2018 ---

That's what you bullies did during 6 months.

You know what ? I never talked directly to you, I just answered your quotes because you are unable to accept that people have a different view on things than yours.

How many bad ratings did you get from the supposed "haters" ? How many bad ratings I had from the "lovers".

Don't play the victim here, you're not.

 

I'm unable to accept any other viewpoints? Buddy, you just said the only opinion here that matters is mine.

 

Yes but I don't care if you think differently.

Did I ever quote you on the love thread ? Elsewhere ? Nah, I didn't. Never.

 

you just summed up why this thread should never had existed, and should be deleted and never allowed ever again.

you don't care if someone thinks differently because they shouldn't be in here? because you don't go into 'their' thread?

it's like it's 100 years ago when you had to go into a particular saloon based on your skin color.

this thread is an insult to everything a forum is supposed to be about.
none of you wanted me posting in here because of my opinion of a movie.. i will not post in here again.

 

This thread has became an insult because of some people's behaviour. There are threads about the prequels and nobody had ever to argue about that.

This is the truth. Some people just come here to smack talk other supposed "fellow" fans and that's all they bring to this thread so yes, it is a little bit agressive because I ain't be bullied by people I barely know.

Why do we have to justify ourselves ?

 

Lets assume for a second that those positive reviews we're real. You just talked "smack" about those opinions, and you claim you're being "bullied"?

 

But they are not. It's your choice to live in another world but it is not mine.

You assume a lot guys.

And participating to this thread is not mandatory. If we want to be lost, it's our choice, we don't need a shepperd.

 

Maybe Lucasfilm should have thought about that before they trolled fans with TLJ. Yeah, it is what it is and since nothing from TFA is carried over in a meaningful way lets call a spade a spade, it's provocation. I'm happy RJ got to make the movie he wanted, but when a filmmaker is allowed to do what he did expect some backlash, that's all I'm saying. You can't have your cake and eat it to, own up to the issues people have with the film because people's feelings are valid. We're not mentally unbalanced, decisions were made that provoked a part of the fanbase, you can't pretend that the fans that take issue are all crazy or just don't get it, it's about responsibility. You take risks, face the consequences.

 

Absolutely !