1. Due to the increased amount of spam bots on the forum, we are strengthening our defenses. You may experience a CAPTCHA challenge from time to time.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Notification emails are working properly again. Please check your email spam folder and if you see any emails from the Cantina there, make sure to mark them as "Not Spam". This will help a lot to whitelist the emails and to stop them going to spam.
    Dismiss Notice
  3. IMPORTANT! To be able to create new threads and rate posts, you need to have at least 30 posts in The Cantina.
    Dismiss Notice
  4. Before posting a new thread, check the list with similar threads that will appear when you start typing the thread's title.
    Dismiss Notice

SPECULATION [Theory] Rey is the good in Vader.

Discussion in 'Star Wars: The Force Awakens' started by Bandini, Mar 17, 2017.

  1. CTrent29

    CTrent29 Rebel Official

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2015
    Posts:
    1,503
    Likes Received:
    1,511
    Trophy Points:
    6,192
    Credits:
    2,693
    Ratings:
    +2,411 / 394 / -178

    Not buying it. I'm sorry, but I'm not buying this one bit. If I'm supposed to believe that Rey is basically the epitome of goodness and sunshine, then I might as well dismiss her as nothing more than a badly written, one-note character. So far, her characterization has not been that impressive to me. Then again, I can say the same about the other Sequel Trilogy characters. I don't think Lucasfilm has done a good job in handling any of them.
     
  2. Bandini

    Bandini Jedi Commander

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2015
    Posts:
    4,862
    Likes Received:
    5,539
    Trophy Points:
    87,267
    Credits:
    9,228
    Ratings:
    +10,282 / 461 / -131
    This thread is one year old :D

    It was a long time ago and yes, they didn"t go that way and I knew it for a long time but it was cool to do that.
     
  3. metadude

    metadude Rebelscum

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2018
    Posts:
    243
    Likes Received:
    405
    Trophy Points:
    1,637
    Credits:
    1,020
    Ratings:
    +656 / 11 / -5
    I read through this thread and your interpretation is brilliant. Follow me on this: a lot of people (perhaps the greater majority) look at a movie and all they see is the surface. They view movies as a kind of, pseudo-documentary. What their eyes see is all that there is to process. Think of it like, meeting a person, and all that you see is the surface of the person. Their gender, their skin color, their physical attractiveness, all of the visible qualities. Now if that is all that you see, you completely miss the real person, the, invisible depth behind the exterior. The inner being, as it were. The proverbial spirit.

    So what you're doing in this thread is looking at the exterior, and you're perceiving beyond the surface to connect with the underlying spirit. In other words, you're viewing the surface as though it is a visible expression of the invisible idea, a metaphor expressed visually. And I would propose that this is what all movies and stories really are. They are metaphors. Spirit couched in soul; invisible expressed in visible. It's like Luke says to Rey in episode 8, "What do you see?" and Rey replies as though she is talking about what she sees visibly "Light and darkness" (as if Rey is commenting on the 'light and shadow' which goes into the filmmaking itself) and Luke replies "It's so much bigger than that". I've felt the same way when people speak of movies, and they can only see the visible surface, yet, it's so much bigger than that.

    I think that you were expecting the metaphor (that idea which you perceive in episode 7) to suddenly be made the surface in episode 8 (in other words, expecting it to suddenly be revealed story-wise that 'you are watching a metaphor') but that isn't necessary for your "theory" to be significant, because your "theory" is not a "theory" at all. It is an interpretation. It is your mind peircing the proverbial veil of the story's surface, to comprehend what lies beyond: to the inner truth of the visible, the metaphor at the heart of the words; the very spirit.

    The idea here is that you say "We are in the psyche of Anakin" but what if, Anakin is also a metaphor? And we are not in the psyche of Anakin, but we are in the psyche of man? Stories and movies come from the psyche of man. The heart and mind of man, is where these "stories" really take place. Movies are outward expressions of what is going on inside of man. These characters are personifications of spiritual things. By spiritual I am meaning, abstract. Belonging to the realm of the immaterial. Invisible. Idea.

    Do you understand what I'm saying? You looked at episode 7 and you saw beyond the surface which is something rarely done by people these days. But I would ask, look at episode 8. What do you see?
     
    • Like Like x 1
  4. Bandini

    Bandini Jedi Commander

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2015
    Posts:
    4,862
    Likes Received:
    5,539
    Trophy Points:
    87,267
    Credits:
    9,228
    Ratings:
    +10,282 / 461 / -131
    Well, thanks :D

    I didn't like ep VIII, unfortunately and from what I have seen, I don't see anything hidden but I only saw it one time.
     
  5. Sir Puke

    Sir Puke Rebel General

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2018
    Posts:
    169
    Likes Received:
    659
    Trophy Points:
    3,992
    Credits:
    1,977
    Ratings:
    +760 / 4 / -0
    I would agree with this statement.
     
    • Like Like x 1
Loading...

Share This Page