1. Due to the increased amount of spam bots on the forum, we are strengthening our defenses. You may experience a CAPTCHA challenge from time to time.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Notification emails are working properly again. Please check your email spam folder and if you see any emails from the Cantina there, make sure to mark them as "Not Spam". This will help a lot to whitelist the emails and to stop them going to spam.
    Dismiss Notice
  3. IMPORTANT! To be able to create new threads and rate posts, you need to have at least 30 posts in The Cantina.
    Dismiss Notice
  4. Before posting a new thread, check the list with similar threads that will appear when you start typing the thread's title.
    Dismiss Notice

The Symmetry of The Last Jedi

Discussion in 'Star Wars: The Last Jedi' started by Jayson, Dec 23, 2017.

  1. Lock_S_Foils

    Lock_S_Foils Red Leader

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2017
    Posts:
    3,512
    Likes Received:
    77,738
    Trophy Points:
    176,657
    Credits:
    57,863
    Ratings:
    +82,804 / 49 / -43
    @Jayson , I have created a thread dedicated to this topic here https://thecantina.starwarsnewsnet....ween-sw-and-tolkiens-lord-of-the-rings.54024/
     
    • Like Like x 1
  2. Dark Toilet

    Dark Toilet Force Sensitive

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2014
    Posts:
    1,456
    Likes Received:
    2,337
    Trophy Points:
    11,077
    Credits:
    3,911
    Ratings:
    +4,340 / 94 / -49
    Brilliant, absolutely brilliant. This is a fascinating thread and you have articulated concepts far better than my clumsy attempts in the past (I started a "Ring Theory in TLJ" thread a while back that got very little traction, unlike this one... but that can be attributed to your eloquence in discussing the concepts in detail).

    I, too, am very attracted to the symmetry, "rhyming," mirroring, chiasmus, or even "Ring Theory" in Star Wars (and life in general). I find it masterful how these concepts play both forwards and backwards. So I have really enjoyed reading OP's thoughts on these concepts. There are two subjects for which I am curious to hear @Jayson's thoughts:

    First, I think the structure of the saga thus far might actually suggest a 12 part story rather than only 9 parts. We can debate about GL's flip-flopping on how may episodes he really had in mind or for which he even had outlines. But just looking at the structure of the saga, I see the ST as not just the stories of next generation of Skywalker heroes and villains (The Legacy of Darth Vader), but providing a sort of mirror image of what has come before. One of the most obvious things to me is the parallel of the tragedy of Anakin Skywalker with that of Kylo Ren. Structurally, it seems to me that the ST is very much the origin story for Kylo Ren that the PT should have been for the origin story for Darth Vader (I did not enjoy the PT anywhere near as much as the OT, but I can appreciate how George Lucas created the symmetry, rhymes, or echoes in the structure between those trilogies. In that respect, the PT is a very commendable work of art.) After all, in my mind Kylo Ren has done nothing in the ST thus far but descend further into the dark and attempt to extinguish the light he feels. Anyway, if the ST is truly the story of the "Tragedy of Kylo Ren," then I would think for the OT "Redemption of Darth Vader" story to be fully balanced, we should have a Sequel-ST that is the story of the "Redemption of Kylo Ren."

    On the other side of this same subject, I also see the ST as not just a mirroring of the PT (and OT), but also the inversion of the OT. In TLJ particularly, we have both a mirroring and inversion of the plot of ESB. At the beginning of ESB, the Rebellion is on a white snow covered planet trying to escape the Empire who has just discovered where they are and they end up on the run. At the end of TLJ, the Resistance ends up on a white salt covered planet after they have been on a long run trying to escape the pursuing First Order. The middle of both movies involves our Force hero on a journey with a Jedi master to discover who he/she really is. Meanwhile, a group of their friends is on a seemingly utopian planet that is not at all what it seems. At the end of ESB, our heroes have escaped the clutches of the Empire and are fully on the run. Meanwhile, the beginning of TLJ has our heroes fully on the run from the pursuing First Order.

    Anyway, I have digressed, but my question is, do you see any evidence within the structure of the ST thus far to suggest that there may actually be 12 parts, so that we will get a "Redemption of Kylo Ren" trilogy? I just think there is too much "ascent" from the dark for Kylo Ren that must take place and one more episode doesn't seem like enough film to do it in convincingly.

    The second thing that I am fascinated by in the Star Wars structure is the application of these concepts not with respect to historical mythological epics like the Odyssey, the Iliad, etc., but to religious works... or "savior" stories. I think everyone has heard Anakin/Darth Vader referred to as "Space Jesus" due to his immaculate conception and his ultimate sacrifice to save Luke and the galaxy. But to me, Anakin/Darth Vader was always an inverse savior figure. What I mean by that is that while most saviors are believed to have led lives devoid of sin, evil, or darkness, Anakin/Darth Vader's life was almost completely marred by darkness and evil, except for his very earliest and last deeds. So in a lot of ways, I always thought of Luke (and almost moreso, Leia) as the true "savior" in the OT because although there was temptation, almost all of their decisions and deeds were guided by compassion and love for one another. I have also read the thread here "Rey is Space Moses"... and of course depending on whether or not you believe her parents abandoned her and sold her for drinking money, Rey could be the new "savior." People seem to see biblical mirroring or rhyming not just in the PT and OT, but the ST too.

    So, I guess the second set of questions I have concern your thoughts on the connections between Star Wars and such biblical and/or "savior" stories, whether they be direct or inverse, as I have suggested. What relationship, if any, do you see in Star Wars characters, both old and new, to such religious figures? EDIT: I just read your comparison of Snoke to King Herod in another thread... Spot on!

    Thanks for this wonderful thread and all of your reasoned insight.
     
    #62 Dark Toilet, Jan 23, 2018
    Last edited: Jan 23, 2018
    • Like Like x 2
    • Great Post Great Post x 1
  3. Jayson

    Jayson Resident Lucasian

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2015
    Posts:
    2,163
    Likes Received:
    6,605
    Trophy Points:
    16,467
    Credits:
    8,703
    Ratings:
    +9,546 / 39 / -14
    I'm always happy to please. :)

    As to your query. Well, first - you're spot on there with the connections, but one way I've been looking at it is this way.
    OT is the themes forward, the act order forward, and the theme order forward.
    PT is the themes inverted, the act order reversed, and the theme order forward.
    ST is the themes reversed, the act order forward, and the theme order backward.

    What I mean by reverse is the following:
    Take the power fight theme.
    In the OT, this is Luke vs Vader and Luke redeems his Father with his actions, and chooses to quit and wins; compelling his Father to change and betray the Dark Side.
    In the PT, this is the Ben and Anakin fight where Anakin damns himself by choosing not to quit, and loses; compelling Ben that Anakin has changed and joined the Dark Side.
    In the ST, this is the Throne Room fight (since TLJ has skipped the order up by combining ESB with ROTJ in Act 2) where Kylo damns himself by betraying the Dark Side and wins, as well as loses at the same time.

    As to the act order and theme order, what I mean is that (no doubt being familiar with the Ring Theory you will know some of this), ROTJ and TPM are parallel acts, ANH and ROTS are parallel acts, and ESB and AOTC of course are, but AOTC is ESB in reverse act order within the film.

    However, TFA was ANH and TLJ was ESB and ROTJ, or...to be more specific.
    TFA was ANH+ROTS and TLJ was ESB+AOTC and ROTJ+TPM and ESB in that order, but the themes in it moved backwards (the lightsaber in TFA is the opposite path that it takes in ANH, for example - going from luke at the beginning to Luke at the end, but the act order within the film still runs forward in direction (e.g. we have a Falcon escape scene roughly in the same spot of the film, a Death Star-like moment at the same part, etc...).
    This results in ESB running in reverse while ROTJ runs forward because ESB ran forward, AOTC ran backward of ESB, and ESB in TLJ arrives first followed by ROTJ hopping a lift along the way.

    And it gets more complex because Anakin's arc is reversed in Kylo, and Luke's arc is reversed in Rey (not inverted...inverted would be that Rey goes dark, Kylo goes light - but reversed. Reverse means we stay the sides, but do everything backwards in meaning from before - if Luke was familial in dilemma, then Rey needs to be the opposite - facing a lack of familial. If Anakin's frustration was trying not to lose family, then Kylo's is trying to lose family..etc...).

    It's an amazingly complicated weave.

    So....can it be that this is a 12 set.
    I take the political stance here: It COULD lead to 12, but it doesn't inherently have to.
    This could all be wrapped up in the next film because at this point ALL reversals have been accomplished categorically, and the next film is free to go about it's structure however it wants to. It is literally free from obligation to a chiasmus lock since TLJ accounted for the ESB/AOTC and the ROTJ/TPM themes in one shot.

    NOW, on the other hand - they COULD also choose to reverse this again.
    I could be that we went ESB with ROTJ tagging along for the ride where Rey gets the ESB run using Luke's themes reversed and Kylo gets the ROTJ run using Anakins themes reversed, and the next film COULD be Kylo gets the ESB with Anakin's ROTS themes reversed, and Rey gets an ROTJ run using Luke's themes reversed.

    Like tying a bow, TLJ is one loop, IX COULD be the other loop to tie off the knot and be the finale.

    That COULD be.
    I have no idea; ultimately this will depend on the business side of the house as to whether or not they decide to do another trilogy related to Kylo and Rey after they finish this. I've heard Kennedy toss the idea around lightly, but nothing specific or definite, and no character's specifically mentioned. She just basically says that there may be further adventures for some of the characters beyond this trilogy. That could mean a few different things.


    *Evil grin*
    Some folks reading along probably chuckled a bit when they got to this part.
    I do have a tendency to tangent off on this very subject considering I have a background in Biblical exegesis and Levant region anthropology (see the Moses thread where I go off on why I don't see Rey as Moses, but if I had to pick anyone, that I would pick Luke).

    Is there a connection?
    Yes. Absolutely there is a connection, HOWEVER, the connection should not be seen AS literal 1:1, nor exclusive.
    There's also connections to Zorestrianism, and actually the Zorestrian connection is easier to make than the Jesus connection.
    I don't actually agree with the Jesus connection as that is literally the only similarity between Jesus and Anakin - everything else differs radically.

    Immaculate birth is not unique to Jesus, but it is the only such birth myth that most in America are familiar with, so that's what gets named first.

    Anakin, Luke and Leia more follow tangents found int he Romulus and Remus myth - twins of immaculate birth who fight for political control from a political family, one kills the other, then commands the raping and kidnapping of women from a nearby city to build his own city, etc... pretty twisted stuff in general.

    But it's not even just this.
    Because it's more that Lucas said, 'Myths often mark the special person with immaculate births, so we'll do that, but we're going to make our special guy fall because that's more interesting than being perfect' (my paraphrase; not his words).

    And that's SW in a nutshell.
    It has LOTS of little pieces that you can point to various religious, and non-religious myths alike because it uses the archetypes but doesn't use any one specific comparison.

    I think a great example of this is Qui Gon Jinn.
    This name is literally Qigong Jinn with a slight twist.
    Qigong in Taoist practice is the art of following a path to purity and balance through nature to find one's true nature, and a Jinn is a lower class of spirit which appear in human or animal form and influence humankind towards good or evil.

    His name, then, literally means that he is a spirit which moves others to balance and purity through nature to reveal each person's true nature.
    This is fitting considering he is the catalyst to Anakin, and it is tragic because he was wrong about Anakin's true nature, but his original actions never-the-less initiated the chain of events which would reveal the true and complicated nature of Anakin.

    So clearly we are not exclusively borrowing from just a Biblical narrative in Star Wars - we are borrowing from all over the place.
    The world is your oyster.
    Well, to Lucas, the world's mythologies were his oyster.


    Cheers,
    Jayson
     
    • Great Post Great Post x 3
    • Like Like x 1
    • Cool Cool x 1
  4. ralfy

    ralfy Clone Commander

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2017
    Posts:
    129
    Likes Received:
    105
    Trophy Points:
    277
    Credits:
    553
    Ratings:
    +174 / 44 / -25
    From what I remember, Kylo turned because he was attacked by Luke, whose action made no sense. Rey, whose Mary Sue character makes her more powerful than even Anakin, reaches to Luke for no useful reason except to be told that Jediism is irrelevant and that everyone can make use of the Force with little effort (including Broom Boy). The only complication involves the relationship between Kylo and Rey, which not only lacks chemistry but is developed partly through the efforts of Snoke, who is ironically taken out of the picture in a banal manner. Similar can be seen in irrational Luke who could have easily countered Kylo much earlier in the story.

    Altogether, TLJ may have symmetry but the basis of such is badly made.
     
    • Cute Cute x 1
  5. Jayson

    Jayson Resident Lucasian

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2015
    Posts:
    2,163
    Likes Received:
    6,605
    Trophy Points:
    16,467
    Credits:
    8,703
    Ratings:
    +9,546 / 39 / -14
    Kylo was making headway to redeeming himself for the first part of the film, at least in action - seemingly, however when he killed Snoke, everything from that point onward went the opposite direction.
    Unlike Luke, the power fight didn't bring redemption, but instead drove his condemnation further. Rather than attempting to remove the ruler to stop the evil; Kylo did so to take over. It's a reversal.

    I was not citing it as the moment that any given character first turned.

    Again, this is not the thread for throwing tomatoes.

    Cheers,
    Jayson
     
    • Like Like x 4
  6. Snazel

    Snazel Force Sensitive

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2015
    Posts:
    992
    Likes Received:
    2,982
    Trophy Points:
    11,042
    Credits:
    4,359
    Ratings:
    +4,185 / 195 / -61
    Each character is tortured by the writer and I think this produces symmetry, but also superb challenge and progression for each major character.

    Rian literally puts every character into their worst crisis.

    Leia comes to the horrifying realization that nobody cares about her rebellion.

    Rey realizes she is nobody.

    Poe of course faces the fact he becomes disloyal to the Resistance at its greatest hour of need.

    Luke of course realizes he can teach better from afar, just like his master before him.

    Kylo realizes killing Han Solo did not subdue his call to the light. But also...actually...Kylo wins the film. Sure Rey escapes and Luke pulls a fast one on him, but he's now the most powerful person in the galaxy, that's a huge win for someone who got shot in the gut by Chewbacca just days earlier. And if you look at how he seduces both Rey and Kylo at the same time to earn that victory, you have to hand it to him, it's a big win. He's smarter than his fan critics give him credit for...he's WINNING...in case anyone hasn't noticed.

    So yeah symmetry, but also tremendous challenge for each major character.

    That's not to say there are not flaws in the script, there most certainly are. I think even the biggest fan of this installment can concede that.

    But in general, the overall arc of the story is an excellent place by the end of the film. And each character progresses in interesting ways. All of them. So in addition to symmetry and challenge, each character comes to a satisfying conclusion, no cliff hanger ending needed.
     
    • Like Like x 4
  7. DailyPlunge

    DailyPlunge Coramoor

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2016
    Posts:
    4,371
    Likes Received:
    15,475
    Trophy Points:
    146,267
    Credits:
    14,996
    Ratings:
    +20,618 / 309 / -97
    I'm not sure DJ is that wise. Well, maybe wise in his own eyes. His view of things is cynical. It's a reason to be apathetic. It's kind of like Han Solo before at the start of A New Hope. I love his philosophy in this film because it presents Finn with another path. Why join this fight if they're just gears in the machine? Ultimately, there are some causes worth fighting against and that's what Finn learns from Rose.
     
    • Like Like x 4
  8. Jayson

    Jayson Resident Lucasian

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2015
    Posts:
    2,163
    Likes Received:
    6,605
    Trophy Points:
    16,467
    Credits:
    8,703
    Ratings:
    +9,546 / 39 / -14
    Oh, no. He's not wise, he's just employed as a "wise man" in the delivery of the poignant refrain in the film's message about absolute good and absolute evil, and holding to ideals of what things are.

    It's funny, in an ironic way, because one of the films central reverent phrases comes from one of the most irreverent characters in the film.

    That's what I meant by "wise in this film's world" - he's meta. What he says is the key to the entire film's narrative language. I think there's a lot of Johnson's philosophies in DJ's lines. There probably are with lots of characters, but it just feels that DJ strikes it rather close.

    Cheers,
    Jayson
     
    • Like Like x 2
    • Great Post Great Post x 1
    • Informative Informative x 1
  9. Moral Hazard

    Moral Hazard Force Sensitive

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2015
    Posts:
    1,289
    Likes Received:
    3,221
    Trophy Points:
    13,167
    Credits:
    7,326
    Ratings:
    +5,168 / 26 / -7
    In the SXSW interview Mark Hamill observes:

    "The person in the movie who is most like-minded with Luke is DJ.
    They both reach the conclusion that war is completely futile.
    Luke goes away to an Island and DJ decides to cash in on it."


    Of course those differences say a lot.
    Luke thinks he's doing the right thing by the galaxy in withdrawing to die.
    DJ thinks he's doing the right thing by himself in informing to survive.
     
    • Like Like x 4
    • Great Post Great Post x 1
    • Wise Wise x 1
  10. DailyPlunge

    DailyPlunge Coramoor

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2016
    Posts:
    4,371
    Likes Received:
    15,475
    Trophy Points:
    146,267
    Credits:
    14,996
    Ratings:
    +20,618 / 309 / -97
    Good catch. Luke learns over the course of the film that withdrawing from the galaxy isn't the correct path. Some things are worth fighting for.
     
    • Like Like x 3
  11. Moral Hazard

    Moral Hazard Force Sensitive

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2015
    Posts:
    1,289
    Likes Received:
    3,221
    Trophy Points:
    13,167
    Credits:
    7,326
    Ratings:
    +5,168 / 26 / -7
    Symmetry...

    Luke.gif
     
    • Like Like x 3
Loading...

Share This Page