1. Due to the increased amount of spam bots on the forum, we are strengthening our defenses. You may experience a CAPTCHA challenge from time to time.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Notification emails are working properly again. Please check your email spam folder and if you see any emails from the Cantina there, make sure to mark them as "Not Spam". This will help a lot to whitelist the emails and to stop them going to spam.
    Dismiss Notice
  3. IMPORTANT! To be able to create new threads and rate posts, you need to have at least 30 posts in The Cantina.
    Dismiss Notice
  4. Before posting a new thread, check the list with similar threads that will appear when you start typing the thread's title.
    Dismiss Notice

Disney and the Prequels

Discussion in 'General Movie Discussion' started by adamclark83, Sep 26, 2014.

  1. Cole

    Cole Force Sensitive

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2014
    Posts:
    1,243
    Likes Received:
    4,101
    Trophy Points:
    13,807
    Credits:
    5,450
    Ratings:
    +5,517 / 125 / -33
    Well it was cannon to a degree or they wouldn't have had to have a press conference and make a big deal out of getting rid of it.
     
  2. WookieeMonster

    WookieeMonster \m/ \m/
    1030th Captain ** (Mod)

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2014
    Posts:
    503
    Likes Received:
    4,071
    Trophy Points:
    17,482
    Credits:
    7,624
    Ratings:
    +4,357 / 12 / -5
    The PT failed to so many other fans IMO for a few reasons.

    1) We all already knew the story.
    2) The story started with Anakin as a little kid, not already as a Jedi Knight.
    3) There is no mystery as to who becomes Darth Vader.
    4) There was only 5 mins of Darth Vader.
    5) No Empire.

    Ok so that's actually more than a few reasons lol. But this is how I look at the PT.

    1) For what they are, they are ok films I do enjoy watching them. There are far worst films out.
    2) What.... was everyone really expecting 3 films of Darth Vader? That would give us no insight as to who Anakin really was.*
    3) For every fan that feels the PT isn't what they were hoping it to be. You can't please everyone. And lets face it. Growing up all of us imagined what the PT would be like.
    4) People complain about to much CGI, yet we all imagined hundreds of Jedi, broader space battles. You may not like what was done. But that's what we got.
    5) We all already knew the story.

    * 3 films of Darth Vader would kick butt tho \m/

    I do agree that there are things in the PT that I would have done differently. Like showing the birth of both twins. We should've only seen Luke being born, not both. Many things about the story don't add up. But the film maker had his reasons for making them the way he did. And I may stand alone when I say this but, I enjoy the PT and I for one will miss George Lucas not being involved as much as before.
     
    • Great Post Great Post x 1
  3. Jedi77-83

    Jedi77-83 Force Sensitive

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2014
    Posts:
    2,285
    Likes Received:
    4,428
    Trophy Points:
    13,687
    Credits:
    5,976
    Ratings:
    +6,713 / 176 / -38
    I firmly believe after they make the ST, there will essentially be 2 SW sagas: 1-6 and 4-9. I honestly think Disney is staying away from any major PT references in fear of backlash from the fans. For instance, they could have had Force Ghost Anakin (Hayden Christenson) be apart of this trilogy, guiding Luke/Leia and the next generation. But then people like me would be furious because I couldn't stand him in the PT. So the safe thing to do if you are going to have any force ghosts in the ST, is just have Yoda guiding the protagonists through as Yoda is universally beloved.

    Which leads me to my original point. When it is all said and done, I think many fans will look at the movies as 4-9, where the story starts with Luke as the protagonists and ends with one of the Skywalker siblings in Episode 9. Then you will have many fans who will enjoy the 1-6 story of The Tragedy of Anakin Skywalker. I just don't see a majority of fans looking at it as 3 trilogies, because there is too much disconnect between them.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  4. WookieeMonster

    WookieeMonster \m/ \m/
    1030th Captain ** (Mod)

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2014
    Posts:
    503
    Likes Received:
    4,071
    Trophy Points:
    17,482
    Credits:
    7,624
    Ratings:
    +4,357 / 12 / -5
    You forget that it's the majority of fans that have made the Star Wars saga the multi media monster that it has been in the last 20 years. Yes there are those who dislike the PT. But Star Wars has survived twice over due to the "majority" of fans who don't mind the PT.

    If the majority of Star Wars fans didn't somewhat tolerate the PT, then it never would have become the merch machine it has. There is a OT fan base, a PT fan base and also a TCW fan base. The OT fan base is torn between the PT. And with the PT and TCW the fan base has done nothing but grow. There are a lot of SW fans on the web that complain about the PT, but there are even more who don't complain. To me the majority of SW fans embrace all Star Wars.

    Disney is worried about fan backlash, but they love what GL has done with Star Wars all the way around. If Disney was going to distance themselves from the PT then why do they sell merch of Donald Duck as Darth Maul? Why do they have PT characters at "their" Star Wars weekends? Disney knows there are just as many, if not more PT and TCW fans as there are OT fans. If you thought GL was bad with making Star Wars a merch machine, then the world will be taken by storm when Disney shows what they can do with it....

    So I feel the majority of Star Wars fans will embrace all 3 trilogies. And that is the 3rd group you forgot to mention \m/
     
    #24 WookieeMonster, Nov 19, 2014
    Last edited: Nov 19, 2014
    • Like Like x 2
    • Wise Wise x 1
  5. Jedi77-83

    Jedi77-83 Force Sensitive

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2014
    Posts:
    2,285
    Likes Received:
    4,428
    Trophy Points:
    13,687
    Credits:
    5,976
    Ratings:
    +6,713 / 176 / -38
    No doubt there are fans of all SW material. I didnt' mention it because I thought that was the obvious first group of fandom, as I was talking more about the split that each trilogy has done to the other section of fanbases. In the end, there is enough SW to go around for everyone, but I have noticed that they have really marketed the Episode 7 stuff to the OT fanbase.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  6. WookieeMonster

    WookieeMonster \m/ \m/
    1030th Captain ** (Mod)

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2014
    Posts:
    503
    Likes Received:
    4,071
    Trophy Points:
    17,482
    Credits:
    7,624
    Ratings:
    +4,357 / 12 / -5
    I noticed that to, and that does make me feel really great about Ep.7
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Friendly Friendly x 1
  7. Rebo

    Rebo Nearsighted Whill Guardian
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2014
    Posts:
    2,500
    Likes Received:
    4,603
    Trophy Points:
    14,747
    Credits:
    6,145
    Ratings:
    +7,330 / 99 / -40
    This may change though. So far, the viral marketing and leaks have pushed towards OT and away from PT. But you could make the argument that this could just be because the diehard online SW fanbase (who are the only ones who care about the movie this far out) skew towards a dislike of the PT. Whereas the casual fan (who are far greater in number than us diehards) may be more tolerant of the PT. I’m not predicting it will happen, but it wouldn’t surprise me that as we get closer to the release date, the PT gets more references as they try to entice casual viewers to return to the saga that most probably don’t even realize has been resurrected yet.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  8. Paulo Henrique

    Paulo Henrique Rebel General

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2014
    Posts:
    496
    Likes Received:
    759
    Trophy Points:
    4,687
    Credits:
    1,517
    Ratings:
    +1,389 / 18 / -5
    Last week I watched again the prequel trilogy and I maintain my thought: I love it. Of course, it has its problems but the OT has too and I don't see anybody bashing about it.

    Episode I: Really, it's a pretty good movie, has one of the best lightsaber battle of the saga. But the problem is Jar Jar. George insisted to make Jar Jar a comic relief and turned to be a bad idea. Jake Lloyd did a good job in the movie.

    Episode II: Well, it's a good movie. There are two or three dumb lines of dialog but in general it's a good movie.

    Episode III: My favorite movie with Empire Strikes Back. The movie is fantastic and every single time I watch it, almost makes me cry ;-;. The problem? Well, it should be longer to develop better the Anakin's story.
     
    • Like Like x 3
  9. Jedi77-83

    Jedi77-83 Force Sensitive

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2014
    Posts:
    2,285
    Likes Received:
    4,428
    Trophy Points:
    13,687
    Credits:
    5,976
    Ratings:
    +6,713 / 176 / -38
    It's funny you mentioned casual viewers, because I sort of have a different take on that fanbase. I actually think they are going to try to go after the first casual fanbase of SW which was the ones from 1977. I'm talking about people who haven't cared about the movies since 1977, and kinda of bolted somewhere between ESB and ROTJ.

    I say this because I know many of my older brothers friends who didn't share the same love of the OT that I did growing up. They were in highschool when SW came out in 1977, and they loved it. But many of them to this day still complain to me about Darth Vader being Luke's dad, as they checked out after ESB. I actually was arguing with one of my older brothers friends a few years back at a family party about the SW movies. He HATES the Vader revelation and DESPISES Luke and Leia being siblings, as he said it goes against everything that made the original great and instead made it one small universe. People like him never saw the PT, nor has even thought about SW for a long time, but he did go to ANH Special Edition in 1997, but didn't bother with the sequels.

    Now if you look at the Box Office Gross of the Special Editions in 1997, there maybe a huge market of fans to market to who aren't necessarily SW diehards, but a huge fan of the original movie:

    ANH: 136 million
    ESB: 67 million
    ROTJ: 45 million

    So as much as we all tout ESB as the best SW movie, the bottom line was that the Original SW made more then both ESB & ROTJ combined when it was re-released in 1997. And many of my older brothers friends are an example of that.
     
    • Like Like x 2
    • Great Post Great Post x 1
  10. Rebo

    Rebo Nearsighted Whill Guardian
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2014
    Posts:
    2,500
    Likes Received:
    4,603
    Trophy Points:
    14,747
    Credits:
    6,145
    Ratings:
    +7,330 / 99 / -40
    No Doubt. The original Star Wars was by far the most popular in its time. However, people like your older brother are not the target demo for the ST. Movie studios are going after a target demo with a blockbuster which mostly consists of young adults in their late teens to 30’s and/or families with children 12 and under. People who were the target demo for the original have mostly aged out of consideration by the studios. Not to dismiss them entirely, but just they go to the theater with lower frequency than their younger counterparts. They are the Redbox/Netflix market, not the AMC/Regal market.

    So, looking at the target demo and removing diehards from the equation, you are left with 2 main groups. Casual fans who have firsthand knowledge of the PT and may or may not have seen the OT. And young kids whose primary exposure is via The Clone Wars and/or Lego Star Wars.

    I’m in my mid 30’s, but I manage a team of 20+ employees all 26 and under. They see my love of Star Wars, but only a couple of them have ever seen an OT movie. Yet almost every single one of them sawy the PT movies in the theater. They don’t have any real love for them, they were just the movies to see when they were kids.

    Moving on to the other target demo, the children. I will take my kids out of it as I have been indoctrinating them with SW toys and movies since birth. But, I have 3 nephews and some of my kids’ friends to sample from. None of them (outside my kids) have ever seen the OT. They love TCW and know the PT.

    These are the casual fans that will turn a 200milliondollar blockbuster into a 1 billion dollar blockbuster. These are the people who keep the transformers machine running and turned Guardians of the Galaxy from a niche summer movie into a behemoth.

    I just saw an article online that said 70% of movie goers have no idea what movie they are seeing until they show up to the theater. These are not people that are coming back to Star Wars because its recapturing the feel of the OT or because they want to see what that Mark Hamill guy has been up to for 30 years. These are people that will walk into a theater and see a poster or recognize a name from a commercial and say “gee honey, lets see that. The kids will like it and its got that funny looking boy from “Girls”” And those people don’t care as much about “those old 80’s movies” but might react well to that blockbuster they saw in their teens.

    None of this is to say that I think JJ will skew towards the prequels, nor do I think he should. I just think when it comes time for superbowl adds, Taco Bell tie ins, and commercials on the Disney channel, you will probably start to see marketing that ties more into the PT than how it is currently leaning. Just my opinion.
     
    • Like Like x 2
  11. Jedi77-83

    Jedi77-83 Force Sensitive

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2014
    Posts:
    2,285
    Likes Received:
    4,428
    Trophy Points:
    13,687
    Credits:
    5,976
    Ratings:
    +6,713 / 176 / -38
    I think that is the real difference between the OT generation and other generations. The OT generation like us LOVE SW like it is a cult, where the other generation may like the movies, but its just another blockbuster to them they saw a few summers ago.

    I say this cause my nephews grew up during the PT just like I grew up during the OT. They were all into SW in 2005 when Episode 3 came out, and they enjoyed the movie (their 3 favorites are ANH, ESB, and ROTS), but that was then this is now. They are in highschool now and SW is no different then the Harry Potter blockbusters or the Avengers. Of course they will see Episode 7 when it comes out because its still SW, but they are nowhere near as much a fan of the movies as my friends were growing up.

    I can name 5 of my friends I grew up with that I still talk to that still love the OT movies, and it is amazing if you think about it. Even guys in work I talk to who grew up with OT all revere those movies whenever they are brought up. Even if the ST is great, I just don't think SW will ever capture a generation like it did with the OT generation. It's just one of those things that was lightning in a bottle that caught a generation of kids at the right time. Maybe if I was born a few years earlier like my older brother's friends, I wouldn't be here.
     
    • Like Like x 2
    • Pessimistic Pessimistic x 1
  12. Rebo

    Rebo Nearsighted Whill Guardian
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2014
    Posts:
    2,500
    Likes Received:
    4,603
    Trophy Points:
    14,747
    Credits:
    6,145
    Ratings:
    +7,330 / 99 / -40
    Exactly. To them Star Wars is another blockbuster. To us, it is THE blockbuster.

    Which actually makes me rethink my stance a bit.

    I wouldn’t be surprised if they don’t reference past Star Wars at all in those mass market targeted commercials. They just need to convince these people that this is the thing to see next Christmas, regardless of any nostalgia or past affiliations. I bet a commercial aimed at someone like us pushes Luke and Han, or R2 and Chewie. A commercial on the Disney channel may only show John and Daisy, and hide all those “unfortunate old people” away from view so as not to drive people away.
     
    • Like Like x 2
  13. Jedi77-83

    Jedi77-83 Force Sensitive

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2014
    Posts:
    2,285
    Likes Received:
    4,428
    Trophy Points:
    13,687
    Credits:
    5,976
    Ratings:
    +6,713 / 176 / -38
    I was thinking about this alot last night, and I think there are 2 type of blockbusters: The summer blockbusters that make huge money that cater to exactly who are talking about. And then there are films like Jaws, Star Wars 1977, ET, Titanic, The Dark Knight, and Avatar, that made obscene amounts of money because they catered to EVERYONE.

    The reason these movies make billions instead of millions is because you aren't limited to fanboys, kids and casual fans, and that is what essentially what everything thinks Episode 7 is marketing too. Now this is not a bad strategy because it will make hundreds of millions domestically, and probably a billion after it is all said and done with foreign gross.

    But why can't Episode 7 appeal to male adults over the age of 45 and females like Titanic did? Avatar did? The Dark Knight did? All of those movies were the must see movie for EVERY movie-goer in the past 15 years and outgrossed any summer blockbuster that appeals to fanboys. Lets just take The Dark Knight for example. That movie is the 4th highest grossing film of all time (now I am not adjusting for inflation), but EVERYONE I know went and saw it, because the buzz was, "You have to see this movie!" I usually go with friends to see movies like this, but I actually went with my friend and his mother and father and law. They kept asking me, "I heard this Dark Knight movie with Heath Ledger as the Joker is great, would you guys want to go?" I never thought I would see a comic book movie with 2 people in the late 50's! But I remember thats what it was like for Star Wars in 1977, as my parents went, my neighbors parents went, my cousins, uncle and aunt, ALONG with kids like me who saw it a zillion times.

    That is why when I was talking about casual audience from the 1977 Star Wars movie, THOSE are the people that rarely see 'fanboy' movies. Maybe Episode 7 gets a great reviews, and the critics proclaim, "Star Wars is back after all of these years, and it doesn't hurt that Ford, Fisher and Hamill are back too." Right now, all of my SW friends are seeing Episode 7, but will people like my friends mother and father in law see it? That would truly make it a blockbuster.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  14. Rebo

    Rebo Nearsighted Whill Guardian
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2014
    Posts:
    2,500
    Likes Received:
    4,603
    Trophy Points:
    14,747
    Credits:
    6,145
    Ratings:
    +7,330 / 99 / -40
    I agree with what you're saying. But the thing with those movies...the ones that become part of the zeitgeist is, they are not predictable. There are certain qualities that can be predicted. They must be approachable to all audiences, so not vulgar or offensive in any way. They must be released in either May-July or November/December to allow for maximum viewing. And they must meet a certain level of quality so that more discerning demo's don't pull away and allowing for a certain level of rewatchability so that you can get multiple viewings from individual theater goers.

    But those things alone aren't enough. All of those movies you mention had something a little extra that is completely unpredictable. Star Wars, was a new kind of movie. The special effects, score, and style were so different than what came before it gave it that extra drive to invade the pop culture landscape. Titanic was similar in an opposite sort of way. That movie harkened back to a kind of golden age spectacle that hadn't been made in some time. I remember people comparing it to Gone with the Wind, so it filled a unique niche that other movies of the time hadn't but that no one could have predicted was so fitting and wanted for the time period. Dark Knight had Ledgers' performance and the way it was connected to his death. People wanted to see the role that drove him to his demise. And Avatar had not just the 3D, but the world creating. A world so fully realized, it drove people to depression and addiction to seeing the movie as they longed to live there more than their own environment.

    This is not to say, episode 7 will not have these sorts of intangible qualities. Just that marketing has a limited impact at that level. It is a right time, right place scenario that can take a movie up above 1 billion dollars. So, I think Disney, seeing that an cultural level event like that is out of their control, will continue to market in ways they are accustomed to, and hope that the drive to see Star Wars return will get it to that level of success. This is why I cringe when I see people predicting that SW will automatically become the top grossing movie of all time. That sort of success is really unpredictable and requires outside factors and a bit of luck and timing to pull off. I'll be happy if it happens, but I'll also be fine if the ST ends up more inline with a typical monstrous blockbuster (around the 350-400 million domestic mark) like the PT did.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  15. Jedi77-83

    Jedi77-83 Force Sensitive

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2014
    Posts:
    2,285
    Likes Received:
    4,428
    Trophy Points:
    13,687
    Credits:
    5,976
    Ratings:
    +6,713 / 176 / -38
    I agree with you about Titanic, Avatar, Star Wars, Jaws, and ET, as they were cultural phenomenons that just took off and never stopped, as they were all original. But The Dark Knight is the one that has me alittle confused at its mass appeal, as I questioned it back in 2008. One, Batman was nothing new to the public like the other movies we named, heck the franchise was dead in 1997 after the Clooney debacle. The reboot had a successful original in Batman Begins, but that was purely a fanboy movie. The Dark Knight's movie gross puzzled me in 2008 and still puzzles me now, and I guess that is why I equate Episode 7 to it in my analogy.

    I do agree with you that the death of Heath Ledger gave the movie a mysterious quality about it, but there had to be more then that? Don't get me wrong, I think The Dark Knight is a great movie, but its no Star Wars, Jaws, or ET, IMO. I am still in shock that my friends in laws wanted to see a comic book movie? They are probably seeing movies like Interstellar right now, yet The Dark Knight was THE movie of 2008 and shattered records before Avatar.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  16. Rebo

    Rebo Nearsighted Whill Guardian
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2014
    Posts:
    2,500
    Likes Received:
    4,603
    Trophy Points:
    14,747
    Credits:
    6,145
    Ratings:
    +7,330 / 99 / -40
    You are right in that Ledgers death was less of a factor than say Avatar's 3d world or Star War's landscape changing genre. It did draw curiosity from casual viewers though which elevated it above its predecessor and was subsequently lost in its sequel. But at the same time, Dark Knight was less of a cultural phenomenon than these other movies as well. Looking at the adjusted all time domestic grosses of these movies, Dark Knight doesn't really compare. Star Wars, ET, Jaws, and Titanic are all in the top 10. Jurassic Park and Avatar in the top 20. Dark Knight is way down at 29, a bit below Avengers and a bit above Spider-Man (2002). Which is probably the appropriate place for that movie. It was huge. Bigger than most blockbusters. But not in the league of the others you mention.
     
    • Like Like x 1
Loading...

Share This Page