1. Due to the increased amount of spam bots on the forum, we are strengthening our defenses. You may experience a CAPTCHA challenge from time to time.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Notification emails are working properly again. Please check your email spam folder and if you see any emails from the Cantina there, make sure to mark them as "Not Spam". This will help a lot to whitelist the emails and to stop them going to spam.
    Dismiss Notice
  3. IMPORTANT! To be able to create new threads and rate posts, you need to have at least 30 posts in The Cantina.
    Dismiss Notice
  4. Before posting a new thread, check the list with similar threads that will appear when you start typing the thread's title.
    Dismiss Notice

SW E7 and it's tie into the overall Canon.

Discussion in 'Star Wars: The Force Awakens' started by Maddog62, Sep 23, 2014.

  1. Maddog62

    Maddog62 Clone Commander

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2014
    Posts:
    57
    Likes Received:
    47
    Trophy Points:
    262
    Credits:
    772
    Ratings:
    +76 / 2 / -0
    This is true on this point. I think the purpose of my original post was meant to point out that the ST may or may not call directly back to the PT, it will not be going out of it way to ignore as some are suggesting. Ignore, implies that it JJ Abrams would have the freedom to retcon the PT or directly write over. I read the rumors that Adam Drive and or Gwen Christie would possibly related to Count Dooku. Now that can work either if true or not. I personally would like to see the linage of the villain or villains have a tie to the past but am also ok if it doesn't. However I know based on official evidence that JJ will not contradicting what happened in the PT based on his personal dislike of the Prequels. I think the point of the synergy plan is to bring in all the different silos of Star Wars Fandom whether that be people who grew up on the OT, PT, and or the EU and that wouldn't make sense to Blatantly disrespect George Lucas in the end.
     
    • Great Post Great Post x 1
  2. Maddog62

    Maddog62 Clone Commander

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2014
    Posts:
    57
    Likes Received:
    47
    Trophy Points:
    262
    Credits:
    772
    Ratings:
    +76 / 2 / -0
    "So anyway, I think there's no NEED to reference the other trilogies. But there is a need to reference the things that we haven't seen(and maybe never will). Its part of what makes the Galaxy Far Far Away seem big and cool."

    There is a beauty to what you wrote. The good thing is in this case there is 30 + years of time that is unknown based on the EU reboot. Anything could have happened in that time. I think all references will be light however there will be a theme that is consistent through all 3 trilogies. I believe that nobody will have to see the first 6 movies to watch Episode 7 in order to get that story and even if Driver is the great grandson of Dooku, you will not need a giant back story to get it.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  3. Maddog62

    Maddog62 Clone Commander

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2014
    Posts:
    57
    Likes Received:
    47
    Trophy Points:
    262
    Credits:
    772
    Ratings:
    +76 / 2 / -0
    Sorry there was an issue with the quote option on the last post.
     
  4. obiwantstowatchstarwars

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2014
    Posts:
    112
    Likes Received:
    83
    Trophy Points:
    887
    Credits:
    748
    Ratings:
    +138 / 4 / -0
    I still think they should mention the kiss between luke and Leia. Maybe Han could make a Crack about it. After all it is canonical. I know at the time it was not intended for Leia to be Luke's sister. But GL inserted that gem in rotj. Now let's get the canonical explanation but the incestuous kiss.how do they explain this. Maybe on alderan it's normal but since she didn't knowhe was her brother that ccan't be used. Maybe that's why luke is missing.......big Jedi Master loves his sister........hahahahahahaha
    also there was no brother kissing sisters in the PT at least they got that right
    just saying it's kinda funny but it is canon(leia)(luke)
     
    • Clouded Clouded x 1
  5. Ree Yees

    Ree Yees Rebel Official

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2014
    Posts:
    635
    Likes Received:
    855
    Trophy Points:
    6,892
    Credits:
    2,027
    Ratings:
    +1,575 / 91 / -24
    I'd love to see some evidence for the statement in the original post, that OT fans are the minority. Referencing a poll on a Star Wars board does not count as evidence.

    Disney is playing this smart, they know that classic style Star Wars remains a phenomenon, so the PT references should be minimal. Besides, storywise the prequels will be so far in the past they won't need that much PT-related material.
     
    • Like Like x 2
  6. DEKKA129

    DEKKA129 Professional Slinger of Balderdash

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2014
    Posts:
    795
    Likes Received:
    1,679
    Trophy Points:
    8,474
    Credits:
    2,889
    Ratings:
    +2,596 / 24 / -4
    That's the crux of the biscuit, IMHO. By the time of Episode 7, the events of TPM will be almost 70 years in the past. The fall of the Republic and Anakin's turn to the dark side will be at least 50 years in the past. Most of the key events in the PT films were things that only a few people were privy to, all of whom are long dead by the time of Episode 7. Not only is there no need to reference PT events in the ST, it really wouldn't even make much sense to do so.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  7. Maddog62

    Maddog62 Clone Commander

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2014
    Posts:
    57
    Likes Received:
    47
    Trophy Points:
    262
    Credits:
    772
    Ratings:
    +76 / 2 / -0
    I don't disagree with either of you. I stated that some people have interpreted "Ignore" to mean writing over and retconing. As for as the word "minority" that is my opinion. You can feel free to find it on you own. There is also a contingent of people who feel there will be zero CGI in Episode 7 because it ruins movies and they are trying to diss Lucas.
     
  8. DEKKA129

    DEKKA129 Professional Slinger of Balderdash

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2014
    Posts:
    795
    Likes Received:
    1,679
    Trophy Points:
    8,474
    Credits:
    2,889
    Ratings:
    +2,596 / 24 / -4
    Whether or not there are people who have interpreted "ignore" to mean "retconning", the fact is that those are two completely different things, and nothing that's been said by the production team or LFL has given the slightest indication that the PT will be retconned. "Some people may say," that "ignore" = "retconning", but that doesn't mean that they have any basis in fact for that claim.

    The same goes for the idea that there will be no CGI whatsoever in Episode 7. People say all kinds of outlandish and baseless things. Doesn't mean that we need to give their claims more weight than they deserve. Seems to me that most folks hereabouts have a far more reasoned view of what to expect from Episode 7 and the ST.
     
    • Great Post Great Post x 1
  9. Qui-Riv-Brid

    Qui-Riv-Brid Rebelscum

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2014
    Posts:
    115
    Likes Received:
    121
    Trophy Points:
    1,157
    Credits:
    926
    Ratings:
    +275 / 29 / -12
    So the most obvious thing is that there can be no Sith in the sequels. The universe must basically be human with the odd alien stuck in a criminal hold, planets must basically be Earth-like wildernesses and no place truly fantastic can be seen. The incredible scope and scale of the visions seen in the PT must also be set aside.

    To go against the prequels means to also go against the original movies as well since they are intrinsically linked. All the holes and omissions in the OTwere filled in by the PT. There must be no heroes journey, no mentors, no rogues, no clowns, no villains, no...well just about everything.

    Since this clearly isn't going to happen and everything that has been said over and over is about a shared universe with continuity the likes of which has never been seen then I think we can dismiss that.

    Right away we have all sorts of PT things coming over in Rebels not the least the Inquisitor himself whose race was first seen in III.

    Will they be constantly referring to specific events from the PT? No not anymore than they will be about OT events. I think that material will be handled in other media.
     
    #29 Qui-Riv-Brid, Sep 24, 2014
    Last edited: Sep 24, 2014
Loading...

Share This Page