New Leaked Footage from Set of Jakku

The discernible
Rey: Let go of me!
Finn: We gotta move!

The indiscernible
Rey: I know how to run fast!

Another idea. I dunno.

 

I think we'll have to agree to disagree there, my friend. Although I think that plenty of mysteries remain with this movie, I'm pretty sure we have much of the sequence of events nailed down. New footage and images just keeps confirming it.

But no matter how it shakes out, we're less than four months away and that feels pretty amazing.

--- Double Post Merged, Aug 30, 2015, Original Post Date: Aug 30, 2015 ---

I like that one, too. And if you squint your ears (what?) it almost maybe sounds like "command." "Command" just doesn't work though, imo.

 

Yeah, I hope it is that, or something like that. Just little lines and banter like that would make the viewers really enjoy seeing Finn and Rey together, a bit like Han and Leia.

 

Rey speaking at 0:33 seconds in is something different. It might be "I know how...blop...blop...blop...blop" lol audio is so bad even when cleaned up a little bit.

 

i think its 99% what she said but another theory would be that since they are running fast, daisy's talking could not be heard anymore just after 2 or 3 meters of running and she maybe even turned left or right in another alley to escape the stormtroopers. "I know how to work my way around there " ?

--- Double Post Merged, Aug 30, 2015, Original Post Date: Aug 30, 2015 ---

if you like you can download a free one month trial of a 500 $ sound editing program called "samplitude" and find the spectral cleaning plugin, its a visual way of fixing sound. very cool

 

Why havent any of the major sites like MSW, SW7N, TFN ran with this and posting the video or a link to it? odd

 

Because they'd be asked to remove it immediately.

 

so, i have been asked 3 times. "ask" doesnt mean they have to. I am just posting the link, not uploaded them. The Daily Motion and Live leak is gone, here a new link
http://tinypic.com/player.php?v=2h2madv>&s=8#.VeJxcLSTxY4
Russian site (and that should be harder to get removed)
http://rutube.ru/video/b697303da73b4b5a8c6b79cea76b6686/

 

That's what I've heard too. But I think it's also important to remember that the whole reason very little has leaked out from Lucasfilm, whether it be via footage or word of mouth, is because of a policy Disney has about revealing certain things about the film. If an extra or anyone involved in the film were to give away vital plot details, they can face serious consequences. If they couldn't be punished for revealing stuff by word of mouth, all it would take to spoil the entire film is one person spewing it out like they did little leaks such as this little video that was quickly taken down. Do you think people wouldn't leak stuff even if they were able to, just out of compassion? Disney is being EXTREMELY protective of their film, and is practically guarding it with their lives. Whenever people post secret information about the government online, they face criminal charges. Whenever people post a secret recipe of a commercial food company online, they face criminal charges. I'm not saying these people could face a punishment to that extent, but you best believe Disney would be doing everything in their power to get these things taken down. Trust me, with a company as powerful as Disney, with a film that requires such careful security, no simpleton with a laptop, an Internet connection, and a creative imagination could get their hands on information as fragile as the entire storyline of the film without somehow being deeply involved with the film. In which case, they could most definitely be punished. I could be wrong, but I'm pretty sure there are contracts you have to sign when you sign on to a film this big with this much secrecy. Even if someone posted a legitimate storyline online and couldn't be directly punished for it, I'm sure someone, somewhere broke some sort of legal contract in order for that story to be there. I'm no lawyer, nor do I know the exact complexion of the secrecy behind the film, but I can guarantee you, Disney has it figured out. Nothing that big could slip through their fingers without them thinking of it beforehand and/or not being able to do anything about it.

 

im glad they are doing everything within the human confines of morality so they can to make sure no one gets to illegaly send important info to the public. so far ive seen no damaging info out there and i make sure i never read any spoiler. im very careful and yes this is 100% serious i hope no one will spoil anything After the movie gets released so i will wear earplugs or my earphones so i dont hear any spoiling info from the previous people who just saw the film

 

that doesn't really make sense, MSW has openly admitted to having stolen property, the shot sheets. if someone gives me a stolen credit card and i don't use it, but go online and describe it included the numbers, isn't that still illegal? this video was taken by an extra with his own personal camera and it had to be taken down, but MSW is reading off the entire movie from documents that belong to disney and they don't seem to care.

 

That's why I think we really don't know much of anything about TFA. A completed scene by scene synopsis online and THIS is the movie you want to keep secret? Yet, you do nothing about it? This synopsis which has been quoted and linked by other websites and you do nothing? Really?

 

Well, as I mentioned earlier, I'm saying these things without fully understanding them myself. I'd think that the people running this website would have far more insight into all of this.

Only thing I can offer up is that the kind of thing we're talking about is not like a stolen credit card. Pretty weak, right? But I think the bottom line is that intellectual property is being treated differently under the law than monetary or physical property.

 

another thing that bugs me is one of the things all the actors talk about is that almost no one even had a full script, not even the leads, but someone had a full shot sheet laying out the whole movie. you would think it would be easy to figure out which 2 or 3 people in production who might of had it give it to MSW. and you would think the people trusted with those kinds of documents would also have the biggest penalties in their NDAs.

 

I think the people who have read and believe that the script is true are in for a big surprise.

 

Revealing the plot of a movie is not a criminal offense. If the person doing the leaking signed a non-disclosure agreement they could face a civil suit, but they could not be prosecuted. A website describing what they saw does not violate any laws. You cannot be prosecuted for observing and describing stolen property.

Government secrets are a category unto themselves, and are not comparable.

This is more akin to an employee of a bank providing insider information of legal activity to a newspaper. If the employee signed a non-disclosure agreement, the employee could be sued. If the newspaper ran a story describing what was said, nothing could be done.

A stolen recipe would compare to a stolen script. A website posting the script for a movie could be legally forced to remove it. A website that describes the general content of a script cannot legally be forced to remove the description. A person steeling a secret recipe could be charged with corporate espionage for the theft, but an employee that was given the recipe could not be charged with a crime for sharing it. That would be a case for civil court, assuming the employee had signed a non-disclosure agreement.

The law is a balancing act between protecting intellectual property and free speech, and the line here is pretty clear cut.

It gets murkier when it comes to photographs. The Luke photo seen on this site was not technically the property of the studio since they didn't take the photo, but because it was taken in a place where the studio had a reasonable expectation of privacy, and it contains trademarked likenesses, they could make a case that it infringes on their intellectual property rights. Would they win such a lawsuit? It's borderline, but few websites would be willing to spend the money on attorney's fees to take it that far. It's safer just to comply with a removal request. On the other hand, a description of the picture is fair game.

 

Great post. This all makes sense to me.

 

Which would explain why the folks here at SW7News have chosen to describe rather than show in their recent reveals .

As for whether the information that MSW is legit, the only way to be sure is to watch the movie when it comes out. The fact is, J.J. Abrams is extremely secretive about his film projects, and I wouldn't put it past him to have purposefully leaked some bogus scripts as well, so MSW could essentially be doing exactly what J.J. and Lucasfilm want.

Conversely, if the scripts they have are indeed legit, Lucasfilm may not want to ask them to take them down because doing so would just confirm that they are legit in the eyes of the public, possibly creating a news event that would spread beyond the rather small audience that a site like MSW gets in comparison to a major news outlet.

 

its funny how the press can link to stolen government doc (like from NSA) and its ok cause they didn't take them, they are just reporting it. Hackers can hack sony and its for the press to post links to the emails. But let a site post a link to a shitty on set video of a movie set or picture of actor and they are told or forced to take it out. I think sites like this one, or others can link to any images they are given. If SW7N is given something, they should have it on a off server host and link to it. Let disney Vhlor. This is why I keep posting links to the leaked video. If it something that full of spoilers i might not link to it.

 

i think that certain people, not everyone, think that they can hide under what they consider the "logic" of legality. everyone knows that the more complex the problem is, the more you have to think about it ... right ? that's exactly the case with copyright material being used by respected websites and i'm talking in general like any website or public journalistic type organisation. i mean when you know that what your doing is wrong and you do it anyway because you are keeping yourself safe under the guise of technicality of law as opposed to the common sense of people who can think in a way that is more than just the simplistic Black or White and its right or wrong and that law exists because of john smith vs jack smith in 1971. i think smart people know that when someone cannot not be charged with a crime for "sharing "leaked footage, it has absolutely Nothing to do with freedom of expression. so respected websites should think about making ad revenue instead of doing the right thing ?