1. Due to the increased amount of spam bots on the forum, we are strengthening our defenses. You may experience a CAPTCHA challenge from time to time.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Notification emails are working properly again. Please check your email spam folder and if you see any emails from the Cantina there, make sure to mark them as "Not Spam". This will help a lot to whitelist the emails and to stop them going to spam.
    Dismiss Notice
  3. IMPORTANT! To be able to create new threads and rate posts, you need to have at least 30 posts in The Cantina.
    Dismiss Notice
  4. Before posting a new thread, check the list with similar threads that will appear when you start typing the thread's title.
    Dismiss Notice

What creates the aesthetic of Star Wars?

Discussion in 'General Movie Discussion' started by General Magma, Jul 3, 2015.

  1. General Magma

    General Magma Rebelscum

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2014
    Posts:
    31
    Likes Received:
    47
    Trophy Points:
    707
    Credits:
    677
    Ratings:
    +62 / 0 / -0
    While some seem to be more capable of identifying it than others, sometimes you just look at something
    and it looks like Star Wars. You see it, and you go, "Yup, that's from Star Wars" or "Yup, that would fit into SW".
    I'm currently doing some research to find out the factors that really give something a "Star Wars-y" look or feel,
    even when there's a comparison between one planet and another, very different planet.

    Imagine, someone were to create a new planet or a new spaceship - what would it need to really look
    and feel like something Star Wars-y to you?
     
    • Like Like x 1
  2. WedgeSalad

    WedgeSalad Rebel General

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2014
    Posts:
    290
    Likes Received:
    494
    Trophy Points:
    4,307
    Credits:
    1,254
    Ratings:
    +807 / 7 / -1
    I think SW has a "lived-in" feel more than most Sci Fi. For example, the Millennium Falcon looks to most in-universe characters as a "hunk o' junk," and Han and Chewie work on it like a couple of grease monkeys would work on a dodgy old engine. But to us, it would be a miracle of science. That doesn't necessarily mean "dark" or "gritty" (common modern film tropes), just natural or routine. Now contrast that with Trek, which always felt sanitized to me.
     
    • Like Like x 3
  3. John Crichton

    John Crichton Rebel Official

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2014
    Posts:
    1,376
    Likes Received:
    1,837
    Trophy Points:
    6,587
    Credits:
    3,141
    Ratings:
    +2,600 / 18 / -12
    I think @WedgeSalad summed it up rather well. The Star Wars Universe is the universe in which some of the most respected things can (in the universe) be no greater than my old truck was in real life. Lived-in, used, repaired, and somewhat dilapidated... but still of purpose. Even the things that could be considered sterile seem to be so for a purpose, mainly that they are kept simplistic due to a military role, like star destroyer bridges.

    Partially this is why some folk don't like the PT as much, as it lost some of the "lived-in" feel in favor of flashy new vehicles/settings and luxurious adornments. It just seemed a bit too new and shiny to be Star Wars.
     
    • Like Like x 3
  4. TK-822

    TK-822 1030th Resistance Cadet

    Joined:
    May 13, 2015
    Posts:
    92
    Likes Received:
    153
    Trophy Points:
    167
    Credits:
    831
    Ratings:
    +169 / 0 / -0
    I very much agree with both John's and Wedge's post. The Star Wars universe did have that gritty and lived in look which actually made the people and objects seem more realistic and relatable. It was often seen in the little details like the sand and dirt on a Sandtropers armor, the weathering on an X-Wing, or the filth and grime of Dagobah. A lot of the costumes, props, and ships in the OT had designs that seemed to be more purpose driven and were not just meant to be flashy. I do feel its that element which sets Star Wars apart from a lot of other space related science fiction. I know because I grew up with the OT I'm biased and I've said in other posts that the PT were good movies but they never "felt" like Star Wars to me. I think a lot of that has to do with them being very crisp, clear, glitzy, and showy movies that relied a lot on special effects and sleek, cool looking eye candy.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Great Post Great Post x 1
  5. LadyMusashi

    LadyMusashi Archwizard Woo-Woo-in-Chief
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2015
    Posts:
    4,583
    Likes Received:
    37,161
    Trophy Points:
    161,027
    Credits:
    36,756
    Ratings:
    +44,803 / 45 / -17
    I agree with all the previous posts, but I would like to add something that is a huge part of these films and their aesthetic - it's the music. For me, it is the element inseparable from the visual. You just have to hear a few notes of Binary Sunset or Imperial March and you are transported to the SW world, you have images in your mind - Tatooine, Darth Vader confronting Luke on Bespin, etc.
     
    • Like Like x 2
  6. Snazel

    Snazel Force Sensitive

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2015
    Posts:
    992
    Likes Received:
    2,982
    Trophy Points:
    11,042
    Credits:
    4,359
    Ratings:
    +4,185 / 195 / -61
    Mostly water. Whiskey, a little pepper, oil of cloves, ginger root and a dozen snake heads, to give it strength.

    The real reason Star Wars works is that it immerses us in a totally alien, foreign universe where even the laws of physics no longer apply, but yet the basic human values of love, compassion and family still ring true.

    This juxtaposition allows the artist to demonstrate what matters to us most and what lasts forever. Even in a time and place totally foreign to our own, we come to know and love what Luke, Han and Leia are fighting for.
     
  7. General Magma

    General Magma Rebelscum

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2014
    Posts:
    31
    Likes Received:
    47
    Trophy Points:
    707
    Credits:
    677
    Ratings:
    +62 / 0 / -0
    Thank you for the responses.
    I do agree that one of the main parts of the Star Wars aesthetic is the used and more rugged looking aspect of it.
    Although that does make me think about Cloud City, which was actually very clean looking for most part.
    Though would you say that any spaceship with that look would look Star Wars-y? What about the designs? I think that
    plays a fairly large part as well. Or the buildings and their shapes, etc. - I suppose certain things would work and other things wouldn't.
    What are your thoughts on this?

    Also, elsewhere, one of the responses I received was that Star Wars tends to exaggerate things.
    Things are either very small or just very large, think of the unnecessarily large hallways of Cloud City,
    or the thin bridges on the Death Star that you could fall down from quite easily.
     
Loading...

Share This Page