1. Due to the increased amount of spam bots on the forum, we are strengthening our defenses. You may experience a CAPTCHA challenge from time to time.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Notification emails are working properly again. Please check your email spam folder and if you see any emails from the Cantina there, make sure to mark them as "Not Spam". This will help a lot to whitelist the emails and to stop them going to spam.
    Dismiss Notice
  3. IMPORTANT! To be able to create new threads and rate posts, you need to have at least 30 posts in The Cantina.
    Dismiss Notice
  4. Before posting a new thread, check the list with similar threads that will appear when you start typing the thread's title.
    Dismiss Notice

SPECULATION If there are to be two trilogies...

Discussion in 'Star Wars: The Force Awakens' started by emphram, Nov 10, 2014.

  1. emphram

    emphram Rebel General

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2014
    Posts:
    667
    Likes Received:
    790
    Trophy Points:
    4,127
    Credits:
    1,775
    Ratings:
    +1,405 / 96 / -58
    I don't have the time to post a long elaborate post, but it has been mentioned that the possibility of two trilogies exist, in which case, they might just ryhme, the odds with the odds and the evens with the evens. It is quite possible that the ST will grow darker as it develops, like the PT, ending in darkness, only to finally end in light in the SST. One generation dies and looses the battle, but the next shall start over and finally bring light to the galaxy.

    What are your opinions?
     
    • Like Like x 1
  2. TheFettMan

    TheFettMan Rebel Official

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2014
    Posts:
    884
    Likes Received:
    662
    Trophy Points:
    6,687
    Credits:
    1,985
    Ratings:
    +1,116 / 56 / -19
    I doubt it.
    I think there will be a arc with the next 3 Star Wars films. It will span the issue with this generation & deal with these evil then if a newer trilogy is produced it will be 10/12 years from now when SFX is better and new interest is generated.
    Like the Marvel super-hero films going until 2028, the Star Wars films will be "spaced out" ;) .
     
  3. emphram

    emphram Rebel General

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2014
    Posts:
    667
    Likes Received:
    790
    Trophy Points:
    4,127
    Credits:
    1,775
    Ratings:
    +1,405 / 96 / -58
    I don't see how SFX or VFX really needs to improve all that much for a new trilogy, the mentality of filmmakers today has drifted significantly from the old days where they were limited by what was achievable to nowadays, where the idea is "what isn't achievable?" . Look at the Harry Potter films, we could have a 6 part story about the new generation a la Harry Potter.
     
    • Wise Wise x 1
  4. Imbrie

    Imbrie Rebel General

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2014
    Posts:
    245
    Likes Received:
    306
    Trophy Points:
    4,022
    Credits:
    1,130
    Ratings:
    +523 / 23 / -6
    Can you provide a link to where the possibility of two trilogies existing is mentioned please?
     
  5. emphram

    emphram Rebel General

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2014
    Posts:
    667
    Likes Received:
    790
    Trophy Points:
    4,127
    Credits:
    1,775
    Ratings:
    +1,405 / 96 / -58
    • Informative Informative x 1
  6. TheFettMan

    TheFettMan Rebel Official

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2014
    Posts:
    884
    Likes Received:
    662
    Trophy Points:
    6,687
    Credits:
    1,985
    Ratings:
    +1,116 / 56 / -19
    It's not a rumor or speculation that Lucas had a longer version of Star Wars. ANH was intended to be 2 films but was condensed.
    Lucas biographer Dale Pollack read the Star Wars 7/8/9 screenplay treatments & said he was impressed. He said; "I wanted to see these characters & new worlds." ;)

    When I was a kid in the 1980s, I read that George Lucas had a extended plan to produce 9 films in the original arc.
    Star Wars was HUGELY successful. No one including Lucas felt it would be such a massive blockbuster but it far exceeded everyone in Hollywood's expectations.
    I'd add that film making & technology will ALWAYS be improving.
    It's short sighted to want to rush out 6/9 new movies when you can pace it out & utilize the latest gear or advances.

    It's been noted how Disney pushed for more IMAX & IMAX 3D scenes but JJ Abrams didn't want to use IMAX because it was loud & cumbersome on locations.
    Just think in 12/15 years what DV or IMAX will be like?
     
  7. emphram

    emphram Rebel General

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2014
    Posts:
    667
    Likes Received:
    790
    Trophy Points:
    4,127
    Credits:
    1,775
    Ratings:
    +1,405 / 96 / -58
    I don´t think they will be spacing it out for the purpose of waiting for new technologies, since you need the technology you're employing to be tested and proven before actually considering using it and risking millions of dollars on it (modern studio mentality), rather they will space the movies out for the purpose of letting people miss Star Wars and get the craving (you all know what I'm talking about you junkies). Perhasp 3 to 5 years tops after IX, and then we'll get another trilogy.
     
    • Wise Wise x 1
  8. Imbrie

    Imbrie Rebel General

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2014
    Posts:
    245
    Likes Received:
    306
    Trophy Points:
    4,022
    Credits:
    1,130
    Ratings:
    +523 / 23 / -6
    My interpretation of that article is that the 12 episode treatments hark back to pre-ROTJ, before Lucas decided to condense the stories for episodes 6-9 into one episode - what became ROTJ. Disney received treatments for episodes 7-9, which would have been episodes 10-12 originally. And, while I have no doubt that more SW films will be made, I do doubt that Lucas provided treatments for them.
     
    #8 Imbrie, Nov 11, 2014
    Last edited: Nov 11, 2014
    • Wise Wise x 1
  9. DarthDwight

    DarthDwight Force Sensitive

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2014
    Posts:
    2,063
    Likes Received:
    2,138
    Trophy Points:
    12,177
    Credits:
    1,565
    Ratings:
    +3,910 / 34 / -23
    I heard it was episodes 7-9 and 3 spin-offs not episodes 10-12.
     
  10. Kramgnol

    Kramgnol Clone Commander

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2014
    Posts:
    143
    Likes Received:
    135
    Trophy Points:
    452
    Credits:
    929
    Ratings:
    +244 / 4 / -4
    But assuming all the movies do well, even bad star wars movies do well at the box office, why would they not milk the cow until they can't get any more milk. They spent billions. That want to make billions.
     
    • Wise Wise x 2
  11. DarthDwight

    DarthDwight Force Sensitive

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2014
    Posts:
    2,063
    Likes Received:
    2,138
    Trophy Points:
    12,177
    Credits:
    1,565
    Ratings:
    +3,910 / 34 / -23
    They will easily make those billions back following the movie release. with all the rebels stuff and toys etc, they will be rolling in the dough.
     
    • Wise Wise x 1
  12. emphram

    emphram Rebel General

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2014
    Posts:
    667
    Likes Received:
    790
    Trophy Points:
    4,127
    Credits:
    1,775
    Ratings:
    +1,405 / 96 / -58
    Maybe, what if each installment of the ST only makes 500ish million, and the spinoffs make just about the same each, then they would probably make another trilogy to rake in another 1.5 billion.
     
    • Wise Wise x 1
  13. Shork

    Shork Rebel Official

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2014
    Posts:
    720
    Likes Received:
    1,301
    Trophy Points:
    5,737
    Credits:
    2,209
    Ratings:
    +1,769 / 45 / -16
    Why not. Star Wars is awesome. But when we get like. 10+ Star Wars Movies (Spin Offs + ST + maybe SST) would be insane tho maybe it will be even too much.
     
    • Wise Wise x 1
    • Clouded Clouded x 1
  14. SWToyscapes

    SWToyscapes Rebel Commander

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2014
    Posts:
    453
    Likes Received:
    366
    Trophy Points:
    2,377
    Credits:
    1,399
    Ratings:
    +748 / 19 / -7
    We've had thousands of comic books, hundreds of novels, umpteen magazine and reference books, and a few cartoon series, tons of toys and general merchandise .... and I'm not yet burned out with Star Wars :) Bad Star Wars, sure, but there can't be too many great live-action and animated projects, they're like space-fantastical crystal meth!
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  15. Darth Spocktor

    Darth Spocktor Rebelscum

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2014
    Posts:
    188
    Likes Received:
    239
    Trophy Points:
    1,447
    Credits:
    1,062
    Ratings:
    +350 / 8 / -0
    Those extra three movies were intended to be spin-offs, which are being made.
     
    • Informative Informative x 1
  16. Kramgnol

    Kramgnol Clone Commander

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2014
    Posts:
    143
    Likes Received:
    135
    Trophy Points:
    452
    Credits:
    929
    Ratings:
    +244 / 4 / -4
    Do you guys really think Disney spent all that money to make 6 movies and a tv show? They spend billions and are spending more to make it all. Yes they will make money on the films, merchandise, theme parks and the like but the hunger for Star Wars is insatiable. Why not do KOTOR trilogy or the further adventures of the Skywalker / Solo's. Demand + Supply = $$$$$$ and Disney is all about the $$$$$$$$$$$.
     
    • Like Like x 2
  17. Darth Spocktor

    Darth Spocktor Rebelscum

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2014
    Posts:
    188
    Likes Received:
    239
    Trophy Points:
    1,447
    Credits:
    1,062
    Ratings:
    +350 / 8 / -0
    True, but I think Disney is wiser than that, they care about satisfying their fans. For example, just look how Marvel (which is owned by Disney) announced their upcoming movies to the fans while Warner Bros announced their upcoming DC movies to investors. Sure Disney is going to make a lot of money off Star Wars, but they care about what they're doing.
     
  18. emphram

    emphram Rebel General

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2014
    Posts:
    667
    Likes Received:
    790
    Trophy Points:
    4,127
    Credits:
    1,775
    Ratings:
    +1,405 / 96 / -58
    Yes, but always to a profitable degree, keep that in mind.
     
  19. TheFettMan

    TheFettMan Rebel Official

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2014
    Posts:
    884
    Likes Received:
    662
    Trophy Points:
    6,687
    Credits:
    1,985
    Ratings:
    +1,116 / 56 / -19
    I'd add here too that we can't be too hasty! :oops:

    Many Hollywood "franchises" had plans or schemes to be 3 films or a "film series" then petered out.
    :(
    The newer Terminators with Christian Bale as John Conner was expected to be a 3 film arc.
    The older "Flash Gordon" re-boot with Sam Jones in the 1980s was intended to be a series. 6-9 films.
    IMDb.com
    The "Riddick" character that Vin Diesel had in the hit Pitch Black was set for a film series too.

    And less we forget; Disney's John Carter? :eek:
    Edgar Rice Burroughs the author had 9, yes 9 different John Carter of Mars stories.

    Star Wars may have spin offs or new story lines(films) but Bad Robot/Disney/ILM would be smart to keep them spaced apart 5/6 years.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  20. Kramgnol

    Kramgnol Clone Commander

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2014
    Posts:
    143
    Likes Received:
    135
    Trophy Points:
    452
    Credits:
    929
    Ratings:
    +244 / 4 / -4
    There have been several movies that are considered sequels for Riddick. My brother mentions it every time a new one comes out.

    John Carter was an experiment that failed

    The Terminators just don't have the draw of Star Wars.

    After 6 movies I might take a year or two off too but there has never been a Franchise like Star Wars before. Trek doesn't even compare.
     
Loading...

Share This Page