1. Due to the increased amount of spam bots on the forum, we are strengthening our defenses. You may experience a CAPTCHA challenge from time to time.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Notification emails are working properly again. Please check your email spam folder and if you see any emails from the Cantina there, make sure to mark them as "Not Spam". This will help a lot to whitelist the emails and to stop them going to spam.
    Dismiss Notice
  3. IMPORTANT! To be able to create new threads and rate posts, you need to have at least 30 posts in The Cantina.
    Dismiss Notice
  4. Before posting a new thread, check the list with similar threads that will appear when you start typing the thread's title.
    Dismiss Notice

Should Disney erase PT from canon?

Discussion in 'Prequel Trilogy' started by Bradford Tyllestad, Jan 16, 2017.

?

Should Disney erase PT from canon?

  1. Do it already!!!

    13 vote(s)
    13.1%
  2. Only ep 1

    1 vote(s)
    1.0%
  3. Only ep 1-2

    1 vote(s)
    1.0%
  4. Only ep 2

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  5. Only ep 2-3

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  6. Only ep 3

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  7. Only ep 1 & 3

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  8. No.

    84 vote(s)
    84.8%
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Rogues1138

    Rogues1138 Jedi Sentinel - Army of Light
    1030th Captain ** (Mod)

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2015
    Posts:
    4,269
    Likes Received:
    40,964
    Trophy Points:
    161,967
    Credits:
    23,797
    Ratings:
    +43,659 / 82 / -39
    They will reboot the prequels, not in our life time, or George Lucas' life time. In the next century, they might decide its time to reboot the whole thing. If you don't like the prequels do what all my friends do, don't watch them. I enjoy them and watch them several times a year.
     
    • Like Like x 3
    • Hopeful Hopeful x 3
  2. GingerByte

    GingerByte Guest

    Credits:
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    Not if the legally binding agreement says otherwise, and I doubt it does allow one. Even with the Disney purchase, George Lucas is still is the only one who can approve the release of the original OT cuts.

    Both him and his estate still has alot of power.
     
    • Like Like x 2
    • Wise Wise x 2
  3. Lock_S_Foils

    Lock_S_Foils Red Leader

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2017
    Posts:
    3,512
    Likes Received:
    77,747
    Trophy Points:
    176,657
    Credits:
    57,867
    Ratings:
    +82,813 / 49 / -43
    I voted no to a Prequel reboot.

    I have a one-word reason for this, more compelling than anything discussed so far:

    GHOSTBUSTERS.
     
    • Like Like x 2
    • Funny Funny x 2
  4. RoyleRancor

    RoyleRancor Car'a'Carn

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2016
    Posts:
    5,793
    Likes Received:
    34,671
    Trophy Points:
    159,917
    Credits:
    25,780
    Ratings:
    +43,325 / 185 / -97
    That would apply if they gender-swapped it with main characters who are really outside of their comfort zone then hired a director who really only has one style and try to force Star Wars into his mold rather than let it fit comfortably in Star Wars....
     
    • Like Like x 2
  5. CTrent29

    CTrent29 Rebel Official

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2015
    Posts:
    1,503
    Likes Received:
    1,511
    Trophy Points:
    6,192
    Credits:
    2,608
    Ratings:
    +2,411 / 394 / -178
    I rather enjoyed "GHOSTBUSTERS". I didn't dismiss the movie as terrible and pretend it had nothing to do with gender issues, like a lot of moviegoers did.
     
  6. Pomojema

    Pomojema Ayatollah Of Rock-&-Rolla
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2014
    Posts:
    10,210
    Likes Received:
    42,774
    Trophy Points:
    171,329
    Credits:
    44,782
    Ratings:
    +53,070 / 127 / -63
    No, I can safely say that it was bad. But it wasn't because of the all-women angle, because even if you cast four men with a similar script, it would have been equally as terrible. It was bad because the movie was just... lazy. From start to finish, the movie failed to understand what was so great about the original and instead settled for a below-subpar script and Scooby Doo-tier CGI. It was as if the entire crew phoned it in and were hoping that they'd somehow make a bankable franchise off of pure mediocrity. And as someone who is a bit of a fan of three of the movie's four leads (I don't think I've seen anything with Kristen Wiig in it, but I'd probably like her style of comedy), that's something that bums me out to say.

    What bums me even more is that the leaked e-mails reveal that former Sony executive Amy Pascal cancelled Ivan Reitman's Ghostbusters III, which actually was in development and would have introduced female Ghostbusters to the team, and in general actually sounded like something you could build a franchise off of - Sony's ulterior motive with revisiting the franchise. This was done in favor of making a passion project that was based around enforcing identity politics over making a quality product, and one where the people behind it made it clear they had nothing but contempt for the old fans. People are not going to remember the failed Ghostbusters with the kind of fondness they do with Rey, Furiosa, Sarah Connor, or Ellen Ripley because there was actual effort placed into writing the latter characters. In fact, I find it doubtful that anyone is going to remember the movie at all in a few years.

    Sony made their bed by acting like they did, and now they have to lie in it as Spider-Man is the only franchise that they can rely on (at least until their terrible non-MCU spin-off ideas screw that up too).

    BUT HOW ABOUT THEM STAR WARS PREQUELS? They're still not going anywhere, live with it.
     
    • Like Like x 3
    • Great Post Great Post x 2
  7. Josh

    Josh Rebel Official

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2017
    Posts:
    564
    Likes Received:
    2,758
    Trophy Points:
    8,917
    Credits:
    4,881
    Ratings:
    +3,414 / 27 / -12
    Maybe he was a legendary Jedi from Obi Wans "certain point of view."

    ;)
     
    • Like Like x 5
  8. Daft Ada

    Daft Ada Rebelscum

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2017
    Posts:
    173
    Likes Received:
    266
    Trophy Points:
    672
    Credits:
    992
    Ratings:
    +374 / 23 / -14
    You were wrong then, weren't you.
    --- Double Post Merged, Apr 10, 2017, Original Post Date: Apr 10, 2017 ---
    And what better way to get the son to avenge the death of his father than by telling the son his dad was a hero?
    --- Double Post Merged, Apr 10, 2017 ---
    The duel between Dooku and Yoda only had one actor in it. I'm not realy sure what directions George Lucas could've given to CGI Yoda in terms of blocking etc.
     
  9. Pawek_13

    Pawek_13 Jedi General

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2016
    Posts:
    3,384
    Likes Received:
    15,619
    Trophy Points:
    144,707
    Credits:
    15,356
    Ratings:
    +20,519 / 72 / -32
    Yoda is still a character that expresses emotions, performs actions and reacts with Count Dooku. How on Earth could Chrostopher Lee, CG artists working on Yoda or his stunt double have any idea how to enact this this scene if they received a non-existent description of the fight. The only thing I can compare it to is a recipe for a meringue that consists of one sentence: "Make meringues using egg whites and white sugar."
     
    • Like Like x 1
  10. Daft Ada

    Daft Ada Rebelscum

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2017
    Posts:
    173
    Likes Received:
    266
    Trophy Points:
    672
    Credits:
    992
    Ratings:
    +374 / 23 / -14
    The answer you seek is in From Puppets To Pixels. It's on the second disc of the Attack of The Clones DVD.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  11. Pawek_13

    Pawek_13 Jedi General

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2016
    Posts:
    3,384
    Likes Received:
    15,619
    Trophy Points:
    144,707
    Credits:
    15,356
    Ratings:
    +20,519 / 72 / -32
    My DVD copies of the six first SW film lack Bonus Features' discs. :(
     
    • Informative Informative x 1
  12. JarJar

    JarJar Guest

    Credits:
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    Very heated topic.
     
    #252 JarJar, Apr 10, 2017
    Last edited by a moderator: Apr 10, 2017
    • Wise Wise x 2
    • Like Like x 1
  13. Nathan_Marrek

    Nathan_Marrek Force Attuned

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2016
    Posts:
    631
    Likes Received:
    7,983
    Trophy Points:
    16,117
    Credits:
    6,763
    Ratings:
    +8,285 / 5 / -4
    I voted for both because Im in the middle. I still loved certain parts of the PT but felt the ideas that were there werent well utilized in a way that could have worked to broaden the most important connections more deeper than what is aleady there...from a certain point of view. Lol.

    In truth i don't care about reboots these days and I honestly think it isnt very fitting for Star Wars as a whole. Im fine with the old EU being legends and I am glad that alot of the good stuff that i enjoyed have been brought back into the new canon. This allows the creative staff to play around with the material and perhaps what may not have been the best idea in terms of characterizations and such could work better the second time around. It also enables writers to provide a more but different take of certain characters and storylines to new perspectives. :)

    I have yet to finish Bloodline... i definitely should.
     
  14. Pawek_13

    Pawek_13 Jedi General

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2016
    Posts:
    3,384
    Likes Received:
    15,619
    Trophy Points:
    144,707
    Credits:
    15,356
    Ratings:
    +20,519 / 72 / -32
    But not for the reason stated in the thread's topic... Prequels are an essential part of SW legacy, whether you like them or not and most of the folks on this forum agree with that statement.
     
    • Wise Wise x 3
    • Like Like x 2
  15. Daft Ada

    Daft Ada Rebelscum

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2017
    Posts:
    173
    Likes Received:
    266
    Trophy Points:
    672
    Credits:
    992
    Ratings:
    +374 / 23 / -14
    I'm sorry to hear that. You can check it out here on YouTube:


    If you get time to watch it, you'll see just how involved George was in making the duel between Dooku and Yoda such a memorable and well executed sequence (which puts the lie to your meringue analogy). Also you'll note Sir Christopher Lee commenting that acting opposite something that isn't there is bread and butter for any actor (their job is to make believe, after all) and that he often acts against something that isn't there - a sly dig at some of thw acting "talent" with whom he's had to work over the years.

    Don't forget, though, that George Lucas is not a fight choreographer - he left the live action fight sequences in the prequels to the genius Nick Gillard. I think in the ROTS feature on the DVD he admits to a lot of "cheats" in the script it such as "They fight"!

    And that fight sequence you mention in TFA. Not much cop is it? Compared to the stuff Ray Park does in TPM it's very basic.
     
    • Informative Informative x 1
  16. Grand Master Galen Marek

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2015
    Posts:
    22,107
    Likes Received:
    101,677
    Trophy Points:
    176,317
    Credits:
    48,378
    Ratings:
    +115,549 / 340 / -131
    I he knew how to choose the right words for the son of Skywalker, a insult would have resulted on Luke on whipping out that lightsaber, endlessly saying ''Liar, liar, liar''
     
    • Like Like x 3
  17. AstromechRecords

    AstromechRecords Jedi General

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2015
    Posts:
    16,794
    Likes Received:
    15,181
    Trophy Points:
    149,777
    Credits:
    20,228
    Ratings:
    +26,536 / 845 / -253
    I was being sarcastic
     
    • Like Like x 1
  18. Daft Ada

    Daft Ada Rebelscum

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2017
    Posts:
    173
    Likes Received:
    266
    Trophy Points:
    672
    Credits:
    992
    Ratings:
    +374 / 23 / -14
    Sarcasm tends not to work too well on internet forums.
     
  19. The Hero With No Fear

    The Hero With No Fear Resident Sand Hater

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2017
    Posts:
    1,237
    Likes Received:
    35,486
    Trophy Points:
    157,617
    Credits:
    23,365
    Ratings:
    +36,698 / 14 / -9
    I rewatched Episode 1 last night. I don't think it's horrible nor great, just good. But something that I noticed during that viewing is how varying the effects look. Sometimes I think the CGI looks quite good, other times it looks really dated. It made me release that all six of the original movies look a little dated in terms of camera visuals and special effects. Of course that's going to happen, but I think they should fix that. I'm not saying to reboot them, or Special Edition them (shudder), but rather touch them up a little bit. With the improved CGI these days, I think that they have the capability to fix certain things, particularly the space battles. I know that a lot of people will disagree with me, and it's really unlikely, but it can help fix up some of the visuals in not just the prequels, but the originals too, rather than reboot them. (Just none of that Special Edition garbage.)
     
    • Like Like x 3
    • Disagree Disagree x 1
  20. Bradford Tyllestad

    Bradford Tyllestad Rebel General

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2014
    Posts:
    268
    Likes Received:
    388
    Trophy Points:
    4,767
    Credits:
    1,754
    Ratings:
    +784 / 84 / -72
    I'm sorry but this trilogy is sadly beyond repair. You can't CGI away bad writing and acting. Maybe if they put Jar-Jar in more scenes in ep2-3 I would like the trilogy more. Jar-Jar is the only memorable and forgiving character in these movies, along with Palpatine to a certain extent.
     
    • Disagree x 2
    • Like x 1
    • Funny x 1
    • Clouded x 1
    • Trolling x 1
    • Dislike x 1
Loading...
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page