That RT user score...

That is a bit arrogant to consider that you and those who agree with you are the only ones who care about this franchise.

 

LOL, wow. Yeah, you don't speak for anyone but yourself lol. It's asinine to convey any level of message that insists that anyone who enjoys this film does not care about Star Wars.

 

Dunno how you can say that actually polling people who have just left a screening is unreliable... Anyways, Vanity Fair weighed in on it...

First of all, it should be noted that the audience members most likely to run to Rotten Tomatoes to register their opinions are a very specific, very reactionary kind of fan. In the less self-selected CinemaScore—where general audiences are polled as they leave the theater—The Last Jedi earned an “A.” Yes, the very same as the well-liked Force Awakens. Furthermore, there’s someone on Facebook who claims to have maliciously and single-handedly manipulated the Rotten Tomatoes score in order to “keep it dropping.”​

https://www.vanityfair.com/hollywoo...ative-fan-reactions-rotten-tomatoes-score/amp

 

Also...

On diving into a comparison between rate of reviews on other current releases and recent blockbusters, we noted a few abnormalities. For instance in The Shape of Water, there are a number of audience reviews where the review copy is for Last Jedi, not Shape of Water. This only lasted for a relatively brief time, but over a span of several users. It reads as if someone might have misconfigured a bot.





In addition, comparing the user review rate between Last Jedi and Thor, we noticed that Last Jedi already has far more than Thor does. While Thor had been slowing to only about a dozen reviews per day in recent weeks, as of Jedi’s opening, the number of Thor reviews have skyrocketed. Many of which are by the newly-created accounts which did a low score for Jedi, then immediately turning around and doing a Thor review.

Comparing that user behavior with other film release, something feels atypical to say the least. If it’s a coordinated campaign or a bot farm, however, remains to be seen. The possibility remains that there is simply an army of individuals all racing to do their very first reviews ever for Jedi, but the more we dig into this the more it feels manipulated.

https://www.bleedingcool.com/2017/12/17/manipulated-audience-score-last-jedi/

--- Double Post Merged, Dec 18, 2017, Original Post Date: Dec 18, 2017 ---

The box office will reflect that. As of right now, the box office is LOUDLY declaring that user score to be absolutely manipulated.

 

So, you are asking about a scenario where people exit a movie happy and having enjoyed what they have seen give it a REALLY good score and then changing their minds later and never going back to another one?

LOOOOL, I am sure that happens, but not on a level that would register at the box office. Yes, exit polls where people who leave a film and are asked to score it are indeed reliable.

 

He does a good job explaining the scoring systems, if you are interested in that it is worth a watch.

TLDR: RT/IMDB user scores are easily manipulated and are untrustworthy. Cinemascore comes from folks who've actually seen the film and are more reliable.

He also adds that either way, you should make your own opinion.