1. Due to the increased amount of spam bots on the forum, we are strengthening our defenses. You may experience a CAPTCHA challenge from time to time.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Notification emails are working properly again. Please check your email spam folder and if you see any emails from the Cantina there, make sure to mark them as "Not Spam". This will help a lot to whitelist the emails and to stop them going to spam.
    Dismiss Notice
  3. IMPORTANT! To be able to create new threads and rate posts, you need to have at least 30 posts in The Cantina.
    Dismiss Notice
  4. Before posting a new thread, check the list with similar threads that will appear when you start typing the thread's title.
    Dismiss Notice

SPECULATION Is Luke Rey's Father? - The Evidence For and Against

Discussion in 'Star Wars: The Last Jedi' started by master_shaitan, Feb 17, 2016.

?

Is Rey the daughter of Luke Skywalker

  1. Yes

    234 vote(s)
    36.2%
  2. No

    288 vote(s)
    44.6%
  3. Undecided

    124 vote(s)
    19.2%
  1. MagnarTheGreat

    MagnarTheGreat Jedi General

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2014
    Posts:
    6,074
    Likes Received:
    9,090
    Trophy Points:
    144,614
    Credits:
    10,244
    Ratings:
    +17,698 / 314 / -187
    I find it strangely interesting that now I've found in the recent canon mentions of that Leia could have been abducted as a child (but wasn't taken from Bail and Breha AFAWK) and Ahsoka almost was abducted as a child but wasn't. And young Anakin was abducted in the Marvel Obi-Wan and Anakin comic to be used by people who wanted Anakin to help them win a war. This is an idea appearing throughout the canon with major characters (Leia, Ahsoka, Anakin, etc.)

    The role of child abduction by both the bad guys and good guys is something worth talking about.

    (And not only for Rey, but for Ben as well. Was he ever abducted at some point in the past? Ideas like that.)
     
    • Great Post Great Post x 2
    • Informative Informative x 2
    • Hopeful Hopeful x 2
    • Like Like x 1
  2. master_shaitan

    master_shaitan Jedi General

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2015
    Posts:
    7,119
    Likes Received:
    10,295
    Trophy Points:
    144,192
    Credits:
    15,738
    Ratings:
    +19,243 / 799 / -292
    Ohhhh racist.

    The opinion of the actress playing Rey who has first hand instructions from the writer about her characters motivation, has no authority on what is or is not a major theme? Seriously?

    I guess it's a coincidence that it ties into exactly what JJ said about wanting the story to not be about genetics but belief? Or how a new generation of people in the galaxy view the old legends that are now myths?

    IMG_1754.GIF
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Funny Funny x 1
    • Hopeful Hopeful x 1
  3. Shadrac

    Shadrac Rebelscum

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2015
    Posts:
    416
    Likes Received:
    314
    Trophy Points:
    1,807
    Credits:
    1,086
    Ratings:
    +816 / 34 / -3
    Again, JJ was talking about how he viewed Star Wars as a child and also clearly states that those are his personal views and has nothing to do with what is canon. Having legends viewed as myths is merely a story element he wanted to be part of the story not an allusion to an overall theme or a desire to explore non-blood related family instead of blood related family. Finally, as I've said before, that wasn't and still is not his call to make. Daisy is an actress not a writer, director, producer or Lucasfilm executive. She has no knowledge of what is or isn't a major them of TFA or the overall trilogy. She isn't privy to enough information to know and certainly isn't part of the writing/decision making process for the films or overall direction of the franchise. The people in those positions haven't said anything about the new saga films focusing on family that isn't related by blood. Finally, Daisy never actually speaks to the themes of the movie but is merely answering a question about who Rey's parents are and says that, to her, Rey's journey and the relationships she has already formed are more important than who Rey's parents are but also acknowledges that who her parents are IS important. In other words, she's giving her opinion on her characters journey not stating anything factual about the movie or it's themes all of which was likely said as a means to avoid answering the question directly.
     
    • Great Post Great Post x 2
    • Wise Wise x 2
    • Like Like x 1
    • Hopeful Hopeful x 1
  4. Jedi MD

    Jedi MD Jedi Commander

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2014
    Posts:
    3,569
    Likes Received:
    7,849
    Trophy Points:
    88,637
    Credits:
    19,754
    Ratings:
    +11,142 / 60 / -6
    You are the Chosen One. The one prophesized to bring balance to the poll.
     
    • Funny Funny x 3
    • Like Like x 2
  5. Darth Basin The Greatest

    Darth Basin The Greatest Rebel Official

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2016
    Posts:
    2,001
    Likes Received:
    2,603
    Trophy Points:
    8,842
    Credits:
    4,014
    Ratings:
    +4,431 / 293 / -150
    Without Jedi MD there can be no balance to the poll. This will begin to makes things right! ;)
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  6. Maximus

    Maximus Reel 2 Dialogue 2

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2014
    Posts:
    3,223
    Likes Received:
    72,455
    Trophy Points:
    171,705
    Credits:
    23,801
    Ratings:
    +78,248 / 26 / -13
    it took 422 pages.. but your finally getting it my friend :p

    that will always be based upon your opinion of the path that Luke should have walked as a responsible text book Jedi trying to save/restore the order.

    We don't know what Luke's opinion on such things has been during the last 30 years - that's a fact.

    We know didly squat about Luke since ROTJ.. didly. We know that he went through a traumatic event to redeem his father.. only to watch him die. We are pretty sure that he didn't pass on what he had learned to his sister.. despite the fact that he was the last Jedi. We know that he started a Jedi academy which was destroyed. We know that he was training his 'nephew'... yes he was training a family member (don't think that one is in the Jedi handbook of being a perfect Jedi) to be a jedi and that went south badly.

    How can we decide from what we know whether or not Luke would have wanted to have a family/children?

    At the end of ROTJ, Luke was a jedi.. like his father before him. He certainly was a Jedi like his father.. emotional, tempestuous and very hung up on his family. the only difference between them is that when they faced the Emperor... one chose the blue pill and the other - red.
    Luke nearly turned.. and he had not been subject to a decade of manipulation from Palpatine like Anakin.

    then TFA is released, and i see a strong willed.. tempestuous girl who is hung up on finding her family, who is strong in the force and is a great pilot.

    To briefly stand on the side of everyone that thinks that Luke isn't Rey's father... i cannot come up with a single satisfactory way that can explain how he is her dad. Every logical part of me thinks the story will go another way, but i cannot ignore my first viewing instinct that she is Rey Skywalker.. daughter of Luke.

    I don't know if i want that to be the case anymore.. really i don't, but my heart keeps telling me it is.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Great Post Great Post x 1
    • Informative Informative x 1
  7. master_shaitan

    master_shaitan Jedi General

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2015
    Posts:
    7,119
    Likes Received:
    10,295
    Trophy Points:
    144,192
    Credits:
    15,738
    Ratings:
    +19,243 / 799 / -292
    But I didn't just pluck my opinion out of thin air! It's based on a logical reading of Luke's character in the OT and where he would go beyond that.
    Luke was (is) the last Jedi - tasked with the most important mission in the galaxy (ever) - to rebuild the Jedi Order so to protect the galaxy from those that wield the Dark Side. This is someone who's father fell to the Dark Side because he opted to have a family and put that before his duty as a Jedi. This is someone who knows the power his family has. This is someone who promised Yoda that he would rebuild the order. This is someone who knows just how easy it is to be pulled to the Dark Side. This is someone who has to (and it appears, did) spend a great deal of time traversing the galaxy seeking Jedi lore that can help him in his mission. This is someone who was brought up without parents and knows the harmfulness of being an absent father. He could even have been privy to the manipulation of Ben Solo from in the womb and beyond. And the only template he has for what a Jedi should be is from his dealing with Kenobi and Yoda - two celibate monks that sacrificed their entire lives for the good of the Jedi Order.

    Does this mean that Luke didn't have a wife and kid? No. But to me it would be a stain against Luke's character if after all he went through in the OT he'd then risk it all (both in terms of just not having the time to be a good father/husband and leader of the Jedi) before he has restored the Jedi Order. This isn't an anti-having kids idea. I think the Jedi could change this rule under the right circumstances and train themselves to take only the positives from it (inspiration for good, not allowing it to become an attachment or become possessive).

    The point is that if Luke is Rey's father then he was neglecting his Jedi duty before the order was able to stand on its own two feet again. You simply can't have a wife and child and be the last Jedi Master without neglecting one or the other. Perhaps this is what happened and the reason that Luke is haunted now? That would just strike me however as a means to continue the story at any cost. Did Luke learn nothing in the OT? "A Jedi must have the deepest commitment, the most serious mind".

    If you'll allow me to present my 2012 ST fan-fic idea...

    My take was that after the events of ROTJ, Luke's origins would've been discovered and due to the colossal impact the Jedi/Sith had on the galaxy, he would've been made a pariah and the use of the Force outlawed by the new Republic. Leia would've kept her relationship to Luke a secret but then (as happened in Bloodline) it was discovered and revealed to the galaxy. I'd then have had Han and Leia murdered in an attack on the Republic by a Sith terrorist cult and one of the Solo twins kidnapped. The remaining twin seeks out Uncle Luke so he can train him/her in the ways of the Jedi. However, in his exile, Luke has discovered that Darth Plagueis created his father through the Dark Side and Luke believes his family is a curse on the galaxy. The Sith cult leader however is none other than Plagueis himself, returning to the galaxy to destroy the Jedi forever and have supreme control over the Force itself.

    It might surprise some people to see that I thought the hero should be a Solo. But for me, the most important thing was wrapping up the Skywalker story once and for all and not taking Luke's character backwards. However, TFA removed any chance of Rey being a Solo and that working out well. There's literally no way of them doing this in my mind and TFA not being made into a farce. And if Luke is the father, then we have a complete rehash of the previous story with the enlightened hero of the OT making silly mistakes.
     
    • Like Like x 2
    • Hopeful Hopeful x 1
  8. Maximus

    Maximus Reel 2 Dialogue 2

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2014
    Posts:
    3,223
    Likes Received:
    72,455
    Trophy Points:
    171,705
    Credits:
    23,801
    Ratings:
    +78,248 / 26 / -13
    so why did he train Ben?


    you see.. i don't see that mistakes were made.

    The chosen one fulfilled the prophecy of bringing balance to the force. part of that was having children.

    Does Luke think that Skywalkers are a danger to the galaxy, or does he perhaps think that they are vital to the galaxy? I know that you think the former... i don't think it's that simple.

    Luke in fact answered that question when he took on his nephew to train. he thinks Skywalkers are dangerous to the galaxy... and yet he trains one? #noodlestwistedherebro

    if you take it a step further... if they are a danger to the galaxy, why would we want one starting an academy? Luke is as dangerous to the galaxy as any other Skywalker would be, and we want him training the future Jedi?

    either the Skywalkers are good for this galaxy, or Yoda should have instructed Luke to kill Leia and then himself to forever destroy the family.
     
    • Like Like x 4
    • Wise Wise x 1
    • Funny Funny x 1
  9. master_shaitan

    master_shaitan Jedi General

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2015
    Posts:
    7,119
    Likes Received:
    10,295
    Trophy Points:
    144,192
    Credits:
    15,738
    Ratings:
    +19,243 / 799 / -292
    Because it was either that or let Ben turn to the Dark Side. It may even be because he discovered what Snoke was up to or even that he used Ben to get to Snoke.

    No, he didn't need children to bring balance. It just turned out that way, in that Luke helped redeem him. But sure, the message is that children bring out the best in you. But that is way too black and white and not transferrable to every other situation. It was great for that moment to redeem Vader but would it be good for Luke to have a family whilst he has the burden of restoring the Jedi Order?

    I don't think it is black and white. He likely sees the threat his family can pose but at the same time knows it's power can be used for good.

    He had no choice. Well, he could've just killed him :p
    Point is, Luke clearly saw what was happening to Ben and rightly saw the better option was to train him.

    Luke could be dangerous but has essentially jumped the dark side hurdle. I imagine it would take an awful lot to get him to turn now (though murdering his wife and child might do it). Luke is good for the galaxy because he is a good guy and can pass on the ways of the Jedi. However, in the long run is it better for Skywalker's tobe running about or not? I'd say not as when the time comes that one falls, the damage such a powerful being could do would be catastrophic.

    Only a Sith deals in absolutes!
    Dispassionately, yes it would be better for Skywalker's not to exist (so long as there is a Jedi Order). But it doesn't work like that. Luke cannot kill Leia or Ben. That would turn him to the Dark Side! This is simply a very Skywalker centric problem. Their bloodline is all powerful. There is no end to their connection to the Force which in turn makes them dangerous if they take the wrong path. That's why for me the saga should end with the Skywalker's dead as every other trilogy that follows will be cast under that family shadow.

    This is essentially Luke's problem, imo. He knows his family history and the potential for danger. But he cannot bring himself to do anything about it - which is probably where he made mistakes with Ben. It needs someone from the outside to cure this family.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Hopeful Hopeful x 1
  10. Maximus

    Maximus Reel 2 Dialogue 2

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2014
    Posts:
    3,223
    Likes Received:
    72,455
    Trophy Points:
    171,705
    Credits:
    23,801
    Ratings:
    +78,248 / 26 / -13
    it all goes back to Anakin's conception... if the force truly did make the first Skywalker (i know right.. another hot debate! lol) then the Skywalkers existing is a will of the force thing.

    Luke may feel that his, Leia's and Ben's existence is what the force wants... which surely would lead to him thinking that more is good - no?

    If Plagueis made Anakin then everything i've said today is utterly fragged up, and Skywalkers=Bad and we want no more of them!

    i don't entirely disagree with that. I would prefer future films/trilogies to go in a different direction.. not sure i want a Game of thrones style ending for the Skywalkers though.
     
    • Wise Wise x 1
  11. master_shaitan

    master_shaitan Jedi General

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2015
    Posts:
    7,119
    Likes Received:
    10,295
    Trophy Points:
    144,192
    Credits:
    15,738
    Ratings:
    +19,243 / 799 / -292
    Even if it was the Force that created him, that doesn't make it a good thing for all of time. If his creation was a reaction to the growing dark side or Sith meddling then I'd see that not as a decision of a sentient God like Force but rather a more scientific reaction. And although it kind of worked out that this powerful creation did destroy the Sith, it was hardly a clean process. That's why the Sith involvement makes so much sense to me.

    I don't want to see them all chopped up. But I think all you have to really do is kill Ben Solo (if Rey isn't a Skywalker) for we know that the likelihood is that Luke and Leia won't be having any kids at their age!
     
    • Like Like x 2
    • Hopeful Hopeful x 1
  12. Maximus

    Maximus Reel 2 Dialogue 2

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2014
    Posts:
    3,223
    Likes Received:
    72,455
    Trophy Points:
    171,705
    Credits:
    23,801
    Ratings:
    +78,248 / 26 / -13
    you already know that i'd actually love some sort of Revan style dark side back story for Rey.

    Whenever i spend some time on this thread, either just reading what others are saying or spouting pants ideas from my own head.. i always end at the point of thinking that it doesn't really matter who Rey is.

    Whoever she is.. she is clearly going to be a powerful force user, and there's a high probability that she will face a battle within herself between light and dark at some point. That was Anakin's journey, and Luke's.. and whoever her parents are, Rey is likely to take that journey as well. Star Wars is that journey... it is that fight, and it would take some very creative minds to move us away from that in future films.
     
    • Wise Wise x 1
    • Hopeful Hopeful x 1
  13. Shadrac

    Shadrac Rebelscum

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2015
    Posts:
    416
    Likes Received:
    314
    Trophy Points:
    1,807
    Credits:
    1,086
    Ratings:
    +816 / 34 / -3
    Yoda tells Luke to 'pass on what you have learned' but I don't remember Luke ever promising Yoda to rebuild the order. Also, Yoda and Ben never tell Luke about his father's fall in any detail and no one else would know so it's unlikely that Luke ever learned why his father fell. Also, it wasn't marrying Padme and having children that caused his fall. It was his inability to rationally let go of his fear of losing her, his lust for power to keep from losing her and his possessiveness of her along with Palpatine's manipulation that led him to the dark side. In short, it was an unhealthy relationship because he was more obsessed with being with her rather than actually loving her unconditionally.

    Luke sought to learn as much as he could about the Jedi order and eventually started his own order that was ultimately destroyed by his Nephew. Clearly he didn't start his order right away as we would have had some fully trained Jedi spread about the galaxy doing their duty and not all in one place where Kylo could easily kill them all. Luke passed the test his father couldn't (resisting Palpatine's manipulation) because, unlike his father, he was able to love unconditionally. Therefore, he could have had a family the healthy way without it being a mistake or his undoing or neglecting his duty as a Jedi. Even GL has said a Jedi could marry and have children if they had a strong enough mind and character. Luke definitely had both of those in the OT. Finally, Kenobi wasn't celibate as we know he had at least one love interest and it's likely Yoda wasn't either when he was younger but it can't be stated for sure whether he was or not.

    Finally and thankfully, the whole 'Plagueis created Anakin' thing was thrown out with the rest of the old EU. That was a horrible idea. The fact is the Force created Anakin, the chosen one, to bring balance to the force which was accomplished through Anakin's children. If Luke doesn't exist, the prophecy would never have been fulfilled. The force also played a big part in Anakin's fall by sending him visions of his mother's and Padme's deaths which fueled his emotional instability and led him to commit dark acts and ultimately choose the dark side. It could, therefore, be argued that it was the will of the force that he fell to the dark side to first destroy an inept Jedi order before fulfilling his prophetic destiny to destroy the Sith. Even Yoda admits he was wrong in not listening to Qui-Gon Jinn and the Jedi suffered for it indicating the Jedi were on the wrong path long before they decided to fight a war. Finally Luke was told that he wasn't the last of the old Jedi but the first of the new indicating that the old order had passed away along with its overly rigid and dogmatic code. Luke was to build a new order that wouldn't make the same mistakes as its predecessor did and it was up to Luke to decide what code that order would follow.

    We're shown in the OT and more recently Rebels that both Yoda and Kenobi aren't the same people they were in the PT. They have regrets and believe they made some horrible mistakes many of which resulted from their strict adherence to the code. It would be foolhardy to think that they would instruct Luke to do exactly as they did in the PT and follow the exact same rules and yet expect different results.
     
    #8433 Shadrac, Apr 5, 2017
    Last edited: Apr 5, 2017
    • Like Like x 4
    • Great Post Great Post x 4
    • Wise Wise x 1
  14. MagnarTheGreat

    MagnarTheGreat Jedi General

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2014
    Posts:
    6,074
    Likes Received:
    9,090
    Trophy Points:
    144,614
    Credits:
    10,244
    Ratings:
    +17,698 / 314 / -187
    Dave Filoni: [Ahsoka]’s a sister to Anakin, she’s a friend.

    ~19 year old Ahsoka Tano also felt a lot like 19 year old Rey does. Broken connections in the Force to those who knew her before, those she shared a history with have vanished from her POV, she wishes they would come back to her. There's quite a few parallels or potential parallels. Also consider Ahsoka as becoming the surrogate little sister to Anakin Skywalker in The Clone Wars and where that story went in Star Wars Rebels. 15 years or so after Ahsoka's connection to Anakin was broken off, she encountered the monster Darth Vader and gradually discovered he was the person she once knew as Anakin.

    So... Ahsoka faked her death and was going by the false name Ashla while hiding out in an outer rim location and working as a mechanic.

    StarWars.com - FATES FULFILLED: DAVE FILONI REFLECTS ON STAR WARS REBELS SEASON TWO, PART 1

    [​IMG]
    Star Wars Rebels - Darth Vader: "Anakin Skywalker was weak. I destroyed him."

    [​IMG]
    The Force Awakens - Kylo Ren: "Your son is gone. He was weak and foolish, like his father. So I destroyed him."

    See also: First canonical Lightsaber confrontation between Luke and Vader
     
    #8434 MagnarTheGreat, Apr 6, 2017
    Last edited: Apr 7, 2017
    • Like Like x 3
    • Informative Informative x 2
    • Great Post Great Post x 1
    • Hopeful Hopeful x 1
  15. Jedihopper

    Jedihopper Rebel General

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2015
    Posts:
    607
    Likes Received:
    840
    Trophy Points:
    4,117
    Credits:
    2,018
    Ratings:
    +1,720 / 74 / -14
    Somewhat on topic - watching Rouge One blu-ray special features, and Lucasfilm Senior VP of development for the story group, Kiri Hart says again "what makes something a saga film is it's related to the Skywalker family in some way" and that rouge one is different.

    Pablo is on there too, making a subtle comparison that Jyn actually knows her identify and her father and family, whereas in the other films you have characters who don't know their family or who their parents are and have to learn that to get their identity...

    To me it clarifies that yep, the saga films are very much Skywalker stories (which Kathleen Kennedy and Bob Iger have both also said) and yep, Rey's family and background is going to be important as to who she is.
     
    • Like Like x 3
    • Informative Informative x 2
    • Hopeful Hopeful x 2
    • Wise Wise x 1
  16. Rogues1138

    Rogues1138 Jedi Sentinel - Army of Light
    1030th Captain ** (Mod)

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2015
    Posts:
    4,271
    Likes Received:
    40,993
    Trophy Points:
    161,967
    Credits:
    23,814
    Ratings:
    +43,690 / 82 / -39
    Still... whomever she is, I'll keep an open mind rather then hate the film because it doesn't pan out the way I want...
     
    • Wise Wise x 3
    • Like Like x 2
    • Friendly Friendly x 1
  17. LadyMusashi

    LadyMusashi Archwizard Woo-Woo-in-Chief
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2015
    Posts:
    4,583
    Likes Received:
    37,170
    Trophy Points:
    161,027
    Credits:
    36,769
    Ratings:
    +44,812 / 45 / -17
    This is well-thought out and well-argued post, that I am sorry I cannot like it more times.

    Another way the change in the Jedi was shown, from Ahsoka novel:

    Capture.JPG
     
    • Like Like x 5
    • Great Post Great Post x 3
  18. master_shaitan

    master_shaitan Jedi General

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2015
    Posts:
    7,119
    Likes Received:
    10,295
    Trophy Points:
    144,192
    Credits:
    15,738
    Ratings:
    +19,243 / 799 / -292
    "Pass on what you have learned", implies continuing the Jedi Order does it not? Are you suggesting that Yoda didn't want Luke to carry on the Jedi or that Luke would have inferred from Yoda that he needed to continue the order?

    I think it's logical to assume Luke would seek to find the truth. And is it not revealed in Bloodline or Aftermath that information regarding Anakin's life is discovered?

    Yes, of course. But the point I am making is that having this relationship, putting it before his commitment to the Jedi, is fundamentally part of this fall. And if Luke is to discover this (he'd know the dangers of becoming attached anyway) then that would be something he'd give serious thought to: Should he risk getting married and having kids? What if this family is threatened? Can he devote time to them as a father whilst building the Jedi Order? The whole point about the Jedi is that they're selfless - and I can't see how Luke can be wholly selfless considering his task as being the last chance to save the Jedi and at the same time opting to raise a family.

    Exactly, Luke spent many years seeking Jedi lore before he began building the Order. Yet within this timeframe he decided to get married and have a child?

    You don't just reject the Dark Side once are cured for life. It's a constant practice, a constant struggle. You don't let go once, you let go every day. Luke would know how having a family would make not becoming attached far harder.

    A spokesperson said that on Lucas' behalf to an impressionable young child.

    I'm talking about Luke's experience of Ben and Yoda. Two Jedi warrior monks who lived in exile on remote worlds, alone, so to serve the Force. Or are you saying Kenobi and Yoda had mistresses off screen?!

    Not quite. Anakin's origins are very much open to interpretation.

    Really? Why did the Force create a chosen one before the Force went out of balance? If it created a chosen one this time, why not again? If the Force can intervene to this extent, why not go further and just kill the Sith itself? The Sith creation theory makes way more sense.

    Possibly - but the prophesy was a prediction and has no direct connection to the creation of Anakin.

    No. The Force didn't send Anakin those visions. Anakin's own fears and emotions led to these visions.

    Again, no, This is so far fetched and absurd. Had Anakin killed Sidious and not Mace Windu, then the Force would've been balanced, Padme would've lived and all the countless evils the Empire committed (and it's remnants continues to commit) would never have happened. The Force isn't a sentient God-like being. It didn't have some master-plan.

    Yes, indeed. They were wrong. Yoda saw that. But they were drawn into the war by the Sith. If the Sith didn't exist then there wouldn't have been a war in the first place. The Sith had been manipulating the Senate for decades, if not centuries! The Jedi's error was in getting too close to that system and then being drawn into a war. But they didn't cause imbalance, the Sith did.

    Indeed. But that doesn't make everything the Jedi of old said to be wrong! And what's more, if Luke is all about creating a new Jedi Order, what is he doing looking to the past? Seeking Jedi lore? Acquiring the help Lor San Tekka, a supporter of the PT Jedi? And would he really be so arrogant to throw out all that his mentors lived by? The "no marriage" rule was about finding a way to best avoid the temptation of the Dark Side for tens of thousands of Jedi. Sure, it might've been better in some ways to try and work through these attachments whilst benefitting from a family - but the threat is there. And Luke being the last of the Jedi, this is something far more pertinent to him than to one of thousands of Jedi that lived in the PT era.

    And yet not once do we hear them say in Rebels that it was a mistake to avoid attachment. They talk about going to war. That was a mistake. Yoda knew this and adapted the order in the OT. But being the last 2 Jedi, Yoda and Kenobi didn't go off start a family whilst watching over the twins. They devoted all their time to the latter because the cause of the Jedi was too important to neglect or risk. Yet you think Luke would do the opposite and have a family without pausing for thought?
    --- Double Post Merged, Apr 6, 2017, Original Post Date: Apr 6, 2017 ---
    And this is something that after the return of the Jedi order, Luke could change and Kenobi and Yoda would want him to change - have the Jedi not have political affiliation to the Republic, but be an independent order that seeks to fight injustice wherever they find it. The Jedi couldn't help Shmi, not because they didn't care about her, but because she was a slave out of their jurisdiction. Had they intervened then they would've created conflict.

    This is the issue with any superhero - should they just intervene whenever they want to? Or leave it to politics and diplomacy to find a peaceful resolution?
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Original Original x 1
    • Hopeful Hopeful x 1
  19. master_shaitan

    master_shaitan Jedi General

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2015
    Posts:
    7,119
    Likes Received:
    10,295
    Trophy Points:
    144,192
    Credits:
    15,738
    Ratings:
    +19,243 / 799 / -292
    "what makes something a saga film is it's related to the Skywalker family in some way"

    ;)


    Wait, these quotes suggest far more strongly that:

    a) The saga films have to connect to the Skywalker's in some way, but not every way - indicating further that Kylo Ren's character (along with Luke and Leia) is more than enough (which Pablo has tweeted as well).
    b) That Rey has no origin that she remembers or will even discover and has to make her own one - eg, join the "Skywalker family"/be adopted by it.

    Thanks for providing 2 slam-dunk quotes for the No vote! :D
     
    • Funny Funny x 2
    • Hopeful Hopeful x 1
    • Clouded Clouded x 1
  20. DailyPlunge

    DailyPlunge Coramoor

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2016
    Posts:
    4,376
    Likes Received:
    15,495
    Trophy Points:
    146,267
    Credits:
    15,014
    Ratings:
    +20,641 / 309 / -97
    This is a very good example of how people see what they want to see in an innocuous quote.
     
    • Like Like x 3
    • Funny Funny x 3
    • Wise Wise x 1
Loading...

Share This Page