1. Due to the increased amount of spam bots on the forum, we are strengthening our defenses. You may experience a CAPTCHA challenge from time to time.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Notification emails are working properly again. Please check your email spam folder and if you see any emails from the Cantina there, make sure to mark them as "Not Spam". This will help a lot to whitelist the emails and to stop them going to spam.
    Dismiss Notice
  3. IMPORTANT! To be able to create new threads and rate posts, you need to have at least 30 posts in The Cantina.
    Dismiss Notice
  4. Before posting a new thread, check the list with similar threads that will appear when you start typing the thread's title.
    Dismiss Notice

SPECULATION Is Luke Rey's Father? - The Evidence For and Against

Discussion in 'Star Wars: The Last Jedi' started by master_shaitan, Feb 17, 2016.

?

Is Rey the daughter of Luke Skywalker

  1. Yes

    234 vote(s)
    36.2%
  2. No

    288 vote(s)
    44.6%
  3. Undecided

    124 vote(s)
    19.2%
  1. master_shaitan

    master_shaitan Jedi General

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2015
    Posts:
    7,119
    Likes Received:
    10,295
    Trophy Points:
    144,192
    Credits:
    15,738
    Ratings:
    +19,243 / 799 / -292
    Loads of options here. Firstly, it could be that Snoke uses Kylo's actions to turn Rey. Getting Rey to fight Kylo and using that info to get her angry. It isn't perhaps so much about her rejecting Luke (like it wasn't about Luke rejecting Kenobi) but just getting her angry enough to use the Dark Side.

    AND/OR

    Luke was to blame for her parents getting caught up. I'm not sure what, but my feeling is that the saber is pivotal - that Rey was always destined to get the saber and become a Jedi. Anyway, if the saber does tie in with her parents and/or maybe the map to ahch to as well, perhaps there that essentially means Luke put her parents in peril?

    I think there are a fair few speculative ideas I could put forward but the real point is that it creates options for conflict. I don't see that if Luke is Rey's father. Unless Luke killed her mother or something equally unbelievable.
     
  2. Addi Ras

    Addi Ras MASTER TEA MAKER
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2015
    Posts:
    4,756
    Likes Received:
    67,618
    Trophy Points:
    171,477
    Credits:
    33,389
    Ratings:
    +71,801 / 13 / -5
    Nice thread now before TFA came out I was a big supporter of luke is rey's dad & that time I felt It would make more sense then Han & leia as parents. Then the film came out & even though I still think Luke as her dad would work & there still could be conflict as I don't think she knows & whoever left her on Jakku has ait to answer for the is now a part of me that likes that Rey parent will be new charters & they reveal will cause her confirm ether because Kylo was the resonance she was abandon or maybe Luke was if they had links to the Knight of Ren.
    Now this speculation on who's Rey parents are is for me far more intresting then if it had been stated exactly who they were in the film & whoever they are will not effectct how I feel both about her charecter (one of the best charecter intros in cinema) or the film series
     
    • Like Like x 2
  3. FN-3263827

    FN-3263827 First Order CPS
    1030th General **** (Mod)

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2016
    Posts:
    10,000
    Likes Received:
    141,413
    Trophy Points:
    173,077
    Credits:
    68,954
    Ratings:
    +157,742 / 65 / -7
    yeah, i guess it could play out a lot of different ways. goes back to what will Snoke do if he thinks he has a chance to groom Rey. and the logical answer is that he'd probably kill Ren as a liability. but yeah, seems like Rey would really have to turn and i'm having a hard time seeing how that could happen just yet.

    definitely think the saber plays a part in that scene somehow as well (as the bridge between Bespin and Rey's abandonment). i wish we had just a few more crumbs to work with regarding the KOR (not knowing who they are and what they're doing is making me crazy ~ hahaha).
     
    • Like Like x 3
  4. master_shaitan

    master_shaitan Jedi General

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2015
    Posts:
    7,119
    Likes Received:
    10,295
    Trophy Points:
    144,192
    Credits:
    15,738
    Ratings:
    +19,243 / 799 / -292
    I'm still confused about the timeline.

    Rey abandoned roughly 14 years before TFA.
    Then there is the Jedi academy thing.
    And then there is the Clan Massacre.

    In reading Pablo Hidalgo's tweet about this (where he says it happens a lot sooner than 15 years ago) it seems he at first says "let's not call it a Jedi academy" - which in my view suggests he is referring instead to the vision scene of the clan massacre but has crossed wires with the original tweeter. He says that this happened much sooner than 15 years ago. Likely In the last 7. So that to me suggests the academy thing could've happened a while back.

    My thoughts are that Rey was left on Jakku 14years before TFA and at this time Kylo Ren would've been around 16. Being 16 and destroying the jedi then would tie in with Han's line that "he was just a boy". I mean, if the Jedi attack was 7 years or less before TFA then Kylo would've been 23+ - certainly not "just a boy". This can then position Rey being left on Jakku at the same time as the Jedi academy destruction and then the Clan Massacre from the vision can be the one later on and this explain perhaps Rey's parents' demise.

    Does that make sense? That tweet just seems confused to me. I recall another one where people were mixing up the vision scene with the jedi academy attack and Pablo (I think) clearing it up and confirming that it wasn't the academy stuff but the clan massacre....

    If we know the exact timeline then it means we can nail down certain story ideas concerning Rey and her parents.
     
    #184 master_shaitan, Feb 20, 2016
    Last edited: Feb 20, 2016
    • Like Like x 2
  5. FN-3263827

    FN-3263827 First Order CPS
    1030th General **** (Mod)

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2016
    Posts:
    10,000
    Likes Received:
    141,413
    Trophy Points:
    173,077
    Credits:
    68,954
    Ratings:
    +157,742 / 65 / -7
    let me see if i can help with what we know about the timeline (and yes, this confuses me too):
    • Rey abandoned about 14 years ago (yes)
    • Luke's new Jedi efforts "destroyed" (and i'm being specific about the language because this is what we actually know. we don't know there was ever actually a "school", which might be why hidalgo says to stop calling it an academy ~ i believe that tweet is a specific reference to the betrayal, not the clan massacre. we also don't know anybody was actually killed in this "destruction".
      • the timing for this has been established as happening within the last 6-7 years (i believe Bloodline will confirm this, as Gray has said that it hasn't happened yet and that's the timing of the book). maybe? hahaha
      • Yes, Ben isn't a boy anymore, but consider the source. i think Han would call him boy no matter how old he was. he is, after all, his boy.
    • Clan massacre
      • this one seems to float. it obviously(?) has to have happened after Ben turned Kylo Ren unless whoever is in that costume and mask is not Ben but whoever Ben killed to assume the leadership position (totally making this up, but that's the only way it wouldn't be Ben ~ needlessly convoluted to my thinking, but whatever).
      • problematically, Rey's already been on Jakku for ten years. so we go back to why was she abandoned? though, again, her parents could have been on the run and intended to fetch her, but couldn't because Ren made hash of them. that doesn't look like what's happening in the scene to me, though.
    not sure where that leaves us.
     
    • Informative Informative x 3
  6. master_shaitan

    master_shaitan Jedi General

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2015
    Posts:
    7,119
    Likes Received:
    10,295
    Trophy Points:
    144,192
    Credits:
    15,738
    Ratings:
    +19,243 / 799 / -292
    Ok, that's cleared that up somewhat. So the Jedi destruction (whatever it was) happened 6-7 years before TFA. So Rey has been alone on Jakku for around 8 years at that point. She would've been about 13 years old. Ben/Kylo was around 24 years old.

    Then we have the Clan Massacre - although interestingly, the Clan Leader title has now been changed to Knight of Ren on IMDB, for the actor that played Kylo's victim. Is this flash back killing scene Kylo becoming the master, or Kylo taking down the clan or a vision of the future?

    I'm just spit balling here and typing this out for my own benefit, I'm not sure where this is going...ha!
    --- Double Post Merged, Feb 20, 2016, Original Post Date: Feb 20, 2016 ---
    One thing that has struck me here is that Rey was abandoned on Jakku 8 years BEFORE the Jedi's destruction.
    I'm guessing that all must've been OK with Luke for those 8 years leading u p to it because:
    1) He was building the Jedi Order
    2) Leia sent Ben to him to help her out
    3) Nothing indicates he was unhappy until the Jedi destruction

    Considering this, if Luke was Rey's father and he either:
    1. Abandoned his daughter 8 years before his Jedi were destroyed
    or
    2. His wife and daughter were taken from him/hid from him 8 years prior to the Jedi destruction

    So, wouldn't Luke have not been in a great frame of mind over these years? There's no reason Leia wouldn't have known yet neither her or Han mention anything about this. They even send their son to Luke to look out for - which would be a dick move if Luke has lost his family at this point. This all suggests to me that Luke hasn't suffered a trauma until his Jedi students are all killed. Hence, he shows no signs of being Rey's father.
     
    • Wise Wise x 1
  7. Ammianus Marcellinus

    Credits:
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    She is in awe and Luke pitties her :)
     
    • Friendly Friendly x 1
  8. master_shaitan

    master_shaitan Jedi General

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2015
    Posts:
    7,119
    Likes Received:
    10,295
    Trophy Points:
    144,192
    Credits:
    15,738
    Ratings:
    +19,243 / 799 / -292
    Oh come on! That's a stretch! If she's in awe how does she have the wherewithal to continue to offer the lightsaber? Shouldn't she be open mouthed? In shock?

    And Luke just looks conflicted. As it says in the script. That isn't a look of pity.
     
    • Friendly Friendly x 1
  9. FN-3263827

    FN-3263827 First Order CPS
    1030th General **** (Mod)

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2016
    Posts:
    10,000
    Likes Received:
    141,413
    Trophy Points:
    173,077
    Credits:
    68,954
    Ratings:
    +157,742 / 65 / -7
    i think he would have had not have not known he had a daughter (which some have suggested)?

    though, just to advocate for the devil, if he was in a crap mindset because he'd "lost" a wife and daughter, that would certainly help explain his spectacular eff-up regarding Ben.

    but i have a hard time reconciling that to the Luke i know.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  10. master_shaitan

    master_shaitan Jedi General

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2015
    Posts:
    7,119
    Likes Received:
    10,295
    Trophy Points:
    144,192
    Credits:
    15,738
    Ratings:
    +19,243 / 799 / -292
    Indeed. It could explain that - but then wouldn't Leia be aware of Luke's issues and thus not consider sending Ben to him? I mean, she tells Han that Luke didn't help Ben because he "is a Jedi" not because "He had a lot of stuff going on". It just strikes me that nothing suggests Luke had any turmoil until the Jedi fell. In fact, there is evidence to the contrary. Yet if he lost his daughter before this point then surely this wouldn't be the case?
     
  11. Jedi MD

    Jedi MD Jedi Commander

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2014
    Posts:
    3,569
    Likes Received:
    7,849
    Trophy Points:
    88,637
    Credits:
    19,754
    Ratings:
    +11,142 / 60 / -6
    A few things

    1. Let's drop the snarkiness and putting down other's views and opinions. The beauty and likely intent of this movie is for people to interpret it in different ways and leaving things for mystery. JJ in statements before the movie even eluded to this as a reason not to spell things out and why the OT was so good. I will watch the movie and interpret it one way. The person next to me will interpret it another way. Until we know for sure neither one of us can say we are right and the hernia wrong. As an example a I place a glass filled halfway with water in room. 2 people walk in and see the glass. One sees it as half full. The other sees it as half empty. However, neither knows if I only filled it up halfway or if I filled it up completely and drank half of it, and can't say with certainty that they are right and the other is wrong until I reveal it. So unless someone gets/has inside info of what JJ,Kasden and Lucasfilm intended with the film then it is disingenuous to claim a differing point of view is invalid
    2. As far as the saga films being about the Skywalkers, that is true. And with Luke and Ben we have that regardless of Rey's parentage. However, I'm sure Disney is planning on creating SW saga films for a long time and at some point the Skywalker lineage will come to an end. It would seem to me that this trilogy could be it. This is a whole new generation of Star Wars movies and there will be a whole new generation of SW fans and Rey may end up being to the new generations of fans what Luke was to us and a new lineage may take over the SW saga films.
    I will be back on later to post some interesting things (in my opinion anyway) I read in Rey's Story.
     
    • Like Like x 4
    • Wise Wise x 1
  12. FN-3263827

    FN-3263827 First Order CPS
    1030th General **** (Mod)

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2016
    Posts:
    10,000
    Likes Received:
    141,413
    Trophy Points:
    173,077
    Credits:
    68,954
    Ratings:
    +157,742 / 65 / -7
    we also don't actually know when Leia sent Ben to Luke. it could have been years before his betrayal.

    if Luke lost a known daughter (and possibly a wife) it obviously didn't "break" him if he was then trying to train up Jedi.
    it appears his retreat from the world was because of what happened with Ben (whatever that was).

    just throwing that out there like a stick on the pyre. i guess to say that if Luke had some other tragedy, it feels kind of disconnected.
     
    • Like Like x 2
  13. Benny Reno

    Benny Reno Clone

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2016
    Posts:
    49
    Likes Received:
    29
    Trophy Points:
    17
    Credits:
    1,098
    Ratings:
    +90 / 22 / -8
    My thoughts?

    I mean no offense here, but I think that you lack understanding of what a narrative story is and what it's basic features are. You're honestly overthinking everything and missing some of the basics, you seem to misunderstand how a story creates conflict for it's characters or what "conflict" is. It's not some abstract concept that's handed down to them from a family member, it's the simple gap between what a character's goal is and what they have to go through to achieve it. And really that's a fundamental feature of what makes a traditional narrative story, if you don't understand the basics of who your protagonist is and what their main goal is you don't understand the story at all.

    You also have to understand that a narrative story on film is told very different from a book. It's not that characters do not have internal conflicts but that their internal conflicts are illustrated by their outward desires.

    In Luke's case, we're introduced to him as a simple farm boy and his goal is to get off Tatooine and have a more meaningful and adventurous life someplace else. That's his basic story and all of the conflict for him leads from that point on. At first the conflict is his uncle making him stay on the farm, once that is out of the way he makes the decision to train with Obi-Wan to become a Jedi and the rest you already know the point is all of the conflict he faces rises from his decision to leave Tatooine and become a Jedi. That never changed when they decided to make Anakin and Vader the same person.

    In Rey's case it's a little different because she's not looking for adventure it ends up finding her and she can't escape it, but otherwise we're introduced to her as a girl who lives a simple life as a scavenger and she has no ambition but to wait for her family, that's what motivates her and keeps her going, and subsequently that is how the film introduces her to the conflict she faces. By the end of the film she's clearly ready to take a more active role in deciding her fate and meeting her personal goals which means finding Luke Skywalker and becoming a Jedi.

    No let's get back to Luke, why would they set things up this way as opposed to him simply being a mythical character for our new heroes to link up with? Because there's no story there. On a deeper level you have to realize that this is the story of the Skywalker family, their rise to fame and heroism, their fall to darkness and their ultimate redemption. It would have been one thing if the story ended at Return of the Jedi, but clearly it did not, clearly we're revisting those things and finding out that Luke and Leia and their children are still struggling with that legacy. If Rey is not a Skywalker the story becomes something else entirely and frankly TFA fails on a very basic narrative storytelling level, Rey has no personal stake in being involved and instead she's just another powerful force user fated to the whims of the all power screenwriter because the movie must have one of those.
     
    • Wise Wise x 2
    • Great Post Great Post x 1
    • Hopeful Hopeful x 1
  14. master_shaitan

    master_shaitan Jedi General

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2015
    Posts:
    7,119
    Likes Received:
    10,295
    Trophy Points:
    144,192
    Credits:
    15,738
    Ratings:
    +19,243 / 799 / -292
    I don't see a retort to the proposition I put to you...
    --- Double Post Merged, Feb 20, 2016, Original Post Date: Feb 20, 2016 ---
    We don't know exactly - but we do know that it happened within the time frame of Rey being left on Jakku and the Jedi destruction by Kylo. As the Jedi destruction was 6-7 years before TFA, obviously that means that it was well after Rey was left on Jakku. So from that we can see that Leia sent Ben to Luke after Rey was left. This is odd to me - surely Luke would've been compromised emotionally after losing his daughter? Yet Han and Leia do not indicate anything was wrong with Luke until the Jedi destruction.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  15. Bosc

    Bosc Force Attuned

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2015
    Posts:
    3,456
    Likes Received:
    5,790
    Trophy Points:
    15,522
    Credits:
    7,117
    Ratings:
    +8,508 / 65 / -17
    My thoughts?

    Make your points without belittling other posters. It is completely unnecessary and unwelcome here.

    Thanks.
     
    • Like Like x 6
  16. Benny Reno

    Benny Reno Clone

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2016
    Posts:
    49
    Likes Received:
    29
    Trophy Points:
    17
    Credits:
    1,098
    Ratings:
    +90 / 22 / -8
    Look man I think understand the source of our disagreement very well and I've been trying to tell you for a while now, it's because you keep making blast up. Done here.

    Done here.

    Frankly this discussing is not interesting, and you're incredibly arrogant despite the fact your posts honestly make no sense and your theories rely entirely on baseless conjecture there isn't a single shred of evidence supporting anything you've said here and you've repeatedly quoted things as facts that are not facts at all. Can't even have a regular conversation here because you don't even challenge the points other people make here. Every time someone posts something that doesn't respond to you in the way you like it or contradicts what you think you just dismiss it.

    Good luck with that.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  17. FN-3263827

    FN-3263827 First Order CPS
    1030th General **** (Mod)

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2016
    Posts:
    10,000
    Likes Received:
    141,413
    Trophy Points:
    173,077
    Credits:
    68,954
    Ratings:
    +157,742 / 65 / -7
    yeah, i guess that's my question too. i mean, there are ways of explaining that: Luke said he was fine, they were all like family, maybe Ben even had a good relationship with Luke at the time. we just don't have enough info.

    but i do agree that's kind of a big deal for no one to mention anything. or, again, to Rey, if they suspect. especially for this family. i mean, Luke and Leia were kept in the dark because Vader was their father. the rationale that they are hiding this from Rey to protect her kind of insults the strength of the character they've built for her, first of all, and secondly, by not telling her, she's wound up right under Snoke's radar. good job, Skywalkers ~ hahaha
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Wise Wise x 1
  18. master_shaitan

    master_shaitan Jedi General

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2015
    Posts:
    7,119
    Likes Received:
    10,295
    Trophy Points:
    144,192
    Credits:
    15,738
    Ratings:
    +19,243 / 799 / -292
    Ok, bye then.
     
  19. Benny Reno

    Benny Reno Clone

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2016
    Posts:
    49
    Likes Received:
    29
    Trophy Points:
    17
    Credits:
    1,098
    Ratings:
    +90 / 22 / -8
    Oh please if this is what you consider belittling others, explaining (very gently at that) that he doesn't seem understand how a narrative story works and then breaking it down for him so he can try to understand where I'm coming from, by all means enjoy your fan fiction sesstions without anyone interrupting.

    What you're really doing is holding back discussion here. I'm sorry if your skin is so thin you can't handle someone telling you that some people's posts here actually make no sense, but don't even try and tell me I'm just trashing on this guy. Pff.

    Frankly I'm insulted, I come in here and lay out some pretty well thought out posts and more than a few of these people just dismiss every point out of hand and keep repeating the same thing. If that's your idea of discussion count me out.
     
    #199 Benny Reno, Feb 20, 2016
    Last edited: Feb 20, 2016
    • Great Post Great Post x 1
  20. Ammianus Marcellinus

    Credits:
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    Pity can be part of being conflicted. And if he looks conflicted: well I would be if my daughter presumed lost would show up at my doorstep with a weapon I lost more than 35 years ago and which reminds me of my previous emotional conflicts and instability.

    Why would she be in shock? She is in awe. She knows what to expect when she visits Luke if she knows who he is :). She is also awed by the fact that the island and ocean of her dreams are true.

    Look we're all filling in emotional blanks here. Like "this how a person should behave, or that is how a person should behave". Does she look suprised enough, why does she hug Leia in such a way etc.etc. etc. In the end speculative and a pointless discussion in which I stupidly participated :p
    --- Double Post Merged, Feb 20, 2016, Original Post Date: Feb 20, 2016 ---
    People change. We are not static emotional agents. No human is. The fact that Luke is hiding on an island and "walked away from all of it" sure is prove that he is not the same Luke as the one presented in the originals.
     
    • Friendly Friendly x 2
Loading...

Share This Page